BBO Discussion Forums: Can someone explain this? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Can someone explain this?

#1 User is offline   bixby 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 161
  • Joined: 2009-August-06

Posted 2020-February-12, 06:29

As dealer, vul against not, you hold: 94 / 1075 / 108642 / 743.

The bidding goes:

P P 1D 1H
P 3D* 4C P
P ?

* = mixed raise, 4+ H, 7-9 total points, forcing

Your call?

My robot partner held the above hand and passed. Why not correct to 4D?

Now that I look at the description of my 4C bid, I see that it says "4+ D, 19 HCP, rebiddable C, 22 total points." I actually had 5 diamonds and 4 clubs. So maybe that's the problem. But with 5 diamonds and 4 clubs and a big hand, am I supposed to open 1C? I had A52 / K / AK953 / AK102. Should I have bid differently? Or is this the robot's fault for leaving it in 4C?
0

#2 User is offline   mythdoc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 2020-January-12
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Tennessee USA

Posted 2020-February-12, 10:24

Short answer is the robot should have corrected you to diamonds, based on its own interpretation of your bid, even if your hand was 5-4 in the minors, instead of 4-5 as it suspected. The AI for the robots is particularly lacking in basic sense in certain situations.
0

#3 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,846
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-February-12, 19:59

I think if GIB has 6 or 7 diamonds it would still have passed 4 clubs. The way to get GIB to preference diamonds is when it has a singleton or void in diamonds and 5 to 8 clubs. Of course, that's not a workable plan since you don't control what GIB holds.
0

#4 User is offline   bixby 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 161
  • Joined: 2009-August-06

Posted 2020-February-14, 17:12

Thanks for these responses.
0

#5 User is offline   wbartley 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 2010-July-23

Posted 2020-February-28, 11:18

I think they just need to remove the rule that says, "If zero points and partner's bid is non-forcing, pass"
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users