MickyB, on May 17 2005, 11:36 AM, said:
I think "explained 'automatically'" is meant to mean 'by the software'.
If I understand this correctly there should be an agent that explained the meaning of partner's (and your own?) bid for you. Now as far as you're allowed to make non-standard agreements with partner, this won't work. Now assuming, say, BBO-Basic (maybe the agent would offer a menu of standard systems), it would be possible to make an agent that explained the meaning of most calls in noncontested auctions. In contested auctions it will not since the meaning of your call will depend on the meaning of opp's calls.
But shouldn't it be part of the challenge to see if you and partner both understand standard bidding? Suppose you bid 4NT in a sequence where it could be debated whether it is quanti or Blackwood. I think it's part of the challange to
1) Know what is standard, and if that is obvious enough for your "intermediate" partner to understand
2) If no (obvious) standard applies, try to deal with such ambigious calls, for example by avoiding them.

Help
