BBO Discussion Forums: Jump Advance of Negative Double - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Jump Advance of Negative Double

#1 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-December-12, 13:57

This is not a GIB bug, but a programming error in my opinion. After an opening bid, overcall, negative double, a jump advance is forcing with GIB. (Ex. 1H - 2C - Dbl - P), 3S is shown as forcing. This is not in accordance with standard methods, as such calls should be invitational. Comments?
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2017-December-18, 23:09

Does it say forcing in the description, or do you infer it from the point count shown?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,750
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-December-19, 00:16

View Postjdonn, on 2017-December-18, 23:09, said:

Does it say forcing in the description, or do you infer it from the point count shown?

Here you go:

Reverse engineering GIB, part 1: A treatise on the insanity of bidding simulations
0

#4 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2017-December-19, 16:55

Ok thanks
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users