Old hand
#21 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-April-27, 18:01
Doesn't seem automatic to pass since others chose to X 2H
#22
Posted 2005-April-27, 19:24
On the question of whether to bid 2D or 1N - I have a slight preference for 2D on the reasoning that partner is less likely to get excited about this response and give me a raise. I really don't want to play 2 or 3nt with these cards.
I do not double the 2H bid - I'm thankful I don't have to play this misfit.
I do not double the 2H bid - I'm thankful I don't have to play this misfit.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#23
Posted 2005-May-02, 13:21
I don't remember partner's hand exactly, but his shape was 3145, he had 17 HCP's and the king of spades.
I bid 1NT, and then doubled 2H. But it wasn't over, the complete auction was:
(1H)-Dbl-pass-1NT
(2D)-Dbl-(2H)-Dbl
(pass)-pass-(Rdbl)-pass
(2S)-Dbl-all pass.
They found their only fit, spades. We could have set it if partner had lead a spade, but he didn't, and they made their game (forgot to tell, it was a team-game). 3NT our way would have been down 1.
After the hand my partner got a bit upset, and said that both 1NT and double were absolutely wrong. Since he had about 17000 masterpoints (ACBL), about 100 times as much as I had, I didn't argue with him. Later he explained that 1NT is not correct since he would play me for more. Both pass and 2D were possible according to him. Once I bid 1NT, I could never double 2H since that would confirm the values I had shown.
Interesting hand.
I bid 1NT, and then doubled 2H. But it wasn't over, the complete auction was:
(1H)-Dbl-pass-1NT
(2D)-Dbl-(2H)-Dbl
(pass)-pass-(Rdbl)-pass
(2S)-Dbl-all pass.
They found their only fit, spades. We could have set it if partner had lead a spade, but he didn't, and they made their game (forgot to tell, it was a team-game). 3NT our way would have been down 1.
After the hand my partner got a bit upset, and said that both 1NT and double were absolutely wrong. Since he had about 17000 masterpoints (ACBL), about 100 times as much as I had, I didn't argue with him. Later he explained that 1NT is not correct since he would play me for more. Both pass and 2D were possible according to him. Once I bid 1NT, I could never double 2H since that would confirm the values I had shown.
Interesting hand.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#24
Posted 2005-May-02, 14:52
Hannie, on May 2 2005, 02:21 PM, said:
They found their only fit, spades. We could have set it if partner had lead a spade, but he didn't, and they made their game (forgot to tell, it was a team-game). 3NT our way would have been down 1.
After the hand my partner got a bit upset, and said that both 1NT and double were absolutely wrong. Since he had about 17000 masterpoints (ACBL), about 100 times as much as I had, I didn't argue with him. Later he explained that 1NT is not correct since he would play me for more. Both pass and 2D were possible according to him. Once I bid 1NT, I could never double 2H since that would confirm the values I had shown.
Interesting hand.
After the hand my partner got a bit upset, and said that both 1NT and double were absolutely wrong. Since he had about 17000 masterpoints (ACBL), about 100 times as much as I had, I didn't argue with him. Later he explained that 1NT is not correct since he would play me for more. Both pass and 2D were possible according to him. Once I bid 1NT, I could never double 2H since that would confirm the values I had shown.
Interesting hand.
If P has 17 and thinks you have full values for 1nt, yes? Why did p not lead trump to play hand in NT? Where are opp getting tricks except with cross ruff?
OH well!
#25
Posted 2005-May-02, 17:29
I agree Mike, I think that people with 17000 masterpoints make silly mistakes too, but that wasn't really the point of the story.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#26
Posted 2005-May-02, 19:30
Hannie, on May 2 2005, 01:21 PM, said:
I don't remember partner's hand exactly, but his shape was 3145, he had 17 HCP's and the king of spades.
I bid 1NT, and then doubled 2H. But it wasn't over, the complete auction was:
(1H)-Dbl-pass-1NT
(2D)-Dbl-(2H)-Dbl
(pass)-pass-(Rdbl)-pass
(2S)-Dbl-all pass.
They found their only fit, spades. We could have set it if partner had lead a spade, but he didn't, and they made their game (forgot to tell, it was a team-game). 3NT our way would have been down 1.
After the hand my partner got a bit upset, and said that both 1NT and double were absolutely wrong. Since he had about 17000 masterpoints (ACBL), about 100 times as much as I had, I didn't argue with him. Later he explained that 1NT is not correct since he would play me for more. Both pass and 2D were possible according to him. Once I bid 1NT, I could never double 2H since that would confirm the values I had shown.
Interesting hand.
I bid 1NT, and then doubled 2H. But it wasn't over, the complete auction was:
(1H)-Dbl-pass-1NT
(2D)-Dbl-(2H)-Dbl
(pass)-pass-(Rdbl)-pass
(2S)-Dbl-all pass.
They found their only fit, spades. We could have set it if partner had lead a spade, but he didn't, and they made their game (forgot to tell, it was a team-game). 3NT our way would have been down 1.
After the hand my partner got a bit upset, and said that both 1NT and double were absolutely wrong. Since he had about 17000 masterpoints (ACBL), about 100 times as much as I had, I didn't argue with him. Later he explained that 1NT is not correct since he would play me for more. Both pass and 2D were possible according to him. Once I bid 1NT, I could never double 2H since that would confirm the values I had shown.
Interesting hand.
right... "no matter what he has, his 2nd double tells me he has a minimum of 16 hcp and could have more... i think his x of 2d is penalty... i'd x 2h..."
the very fact that he x'd 2♦ shows his strength *and* his disposition towards diamonds, imo... i like your x of 2♥... i believe it's down several on a heart lead, same as i believe your partner should have led a spade (as mike said)
of course he is forced to x 2♠ (else bid, else forcing pass), but the fact that it didn't work out might not be an indictment against your bidding... but 17,000 mps does make for a good argument
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#27
Posted 2005-May-08, 00:44
luis, on Apr 27 2005, 10:02 AM, said:
I won't double 2h.
1NT,then pass.They must escape away from 2HX.
My BLOG on bridge game:
bridge blog001:
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
"You are not thinking. You are merely being logical". - Neils Bohr
bridge blog001:
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
"You are not thinking. You are merely being logical". - Neils Bohr

Help
