Thought this one was clear cut Perhaps no such thing in bridge?
#41
Posted 2005-April-11, 03:27
#42
Posted 2005-April-11, 06:04
cherdano, on Apr 10 2005, 05:29 PM, said:
What would the BBO panel bid?
Arend
Clear pass...
#45
Posted 2005-April-11, 07:12
If so, 2♣ is definitely the spot for us, but I don't like to guess, so please pass next time. A simple rule is worth following in most instances:
Pass in 2nd seat after RHO opens the bidding does not deny an opening hand
It only denies a hand that is suitable to take any action - either because it's weak or because it has been kept out of the bidding with too many cards in the opening suit.
Roland
#46
Posted 2005-April-11, 10:30
(P)-P-(1♣)-1NT
(2♦*)-2♥-(P)-3♥
(P)-4♥-AP
*=non-forcing.
If 1NT may have been an overbid, the hand had become a maximum when the bidding came back...
Of course, pass shouldn't miss game here, either.
(You may not agree with partner's pass in 2nd seat, but for us, 2♥ at this vulnerability/positiong would need 6 tricks in partner's hand.)
#47
Posted 2005-April-11, 10:36
#48
Posted 2005-April-11, 10:37
#49
Posted 2005-April-11, 10:53
cherdano, on Apr 10 2005, 11:29 AM, said:
RHO opens 1♣ (5-card majors) in 3rd seat.
What would the BBO panel bid?
Arend
PASS without hesitation, as Roland said. This seems a really clear-cut for me.
#50
Posted 2005-April-11, 14:09
An everyday hand with an everyday auction playing a system played by 99.9% of the non-experts in North America and many around the world and we get 4 possible bids: 1NT, 1H, X, Pass.
If bridge players are describing this simple hand and overcall with 4 possible bids I find it a wonder we comprehend any of our partners bids if this common hand has 4 bid options.
On this hand I passed, LHO bid 3nt and went down 2 when they were locked out of their hand with 8 running clubs.
The other table made a take-out x and somehow ended up in 1NTX.
My guess is a 1H overcall will end up being safe as P will pass with his 2HCP and the opp will end up in some number of clubs or 3nt. If P gets frisky and raises to 2H that will not work well.
#51
Posted 2005-April-11, 16:44
#52
Posted 2005-April-11, 17:32
In the end, you have to figure out what works best for you and your partner, especially in the context of your competitive agreements. You will develop your own body of knowledge that may change over time on how to handle these types of hands.
#53
Posted 2005-April-11, 17:43
#54
Posted 2005-April-12, 01:40
mike777, on Apr 11 2005, 08:09 PM, said:
The other table made a take-out x and somehow ended up in 1NTX.
Hi Mike,
could yo post the 4 hands if you remember them (or at least your pard's hand) ?
Thanks ! :-)
#55
Posted 2005-April-12, 08:02
QXXX=XXX=TXX=XXX
LHO WAS:
TXX=TX=VOID=AKQJT9XX
RHO SOMETHING LIKE:
KXX=KJ97=AK8XXX=VOID
#56
Posted 2005-April-12, 08:08
mike777, on Apr 12 2005, 02:02 PM, said:
QXXX=XXX=TXX=XXX
LHO WAS:
TXX=TX=VOID=AKQJT9XX
RHO SOMETHING LIKE:
KXX=KJ97=AK8XXX=VOID
So I guess that doubling for t/o would have simply driven us to a 1S contract in a 4-3 moysian fit (or, most probably, opps would have looked for game).
Maybe they would double our 1S contract, but in that case I doubt overcalling 1NT would fare any better....
Instead, 1H overcall with AQ8x, with aggressive raises agreed with pard is not appealing to me...
On the other hand, pass runs the risks outlined by Fred and the ther folks.

Help

RHO opens 1♣ (5-card majors) in 3rd seat.