opening 3 hand
#1
Posted 2005-March-31, 08:20
Indi
♠ AQ105
♥ J85432
♦ 102
♣ 7
What would you bid after two passes?
#2
Posted 2005-March-31, 08:24
#3
Posted 2005-March-31, 09:23
Holding the majors, there is a good chance that I can come in later, unless the opps are sky high before my next turn.
Roland
#4
Posted 2005-March-31, 09:48
Not a good suit for 2♥ and I have 4♠ so I should probably come in the bidding later
Alain
#7
Posted 2005-March-31, 12:42
Jlall, on Mar 31 2005, 07:27 PM, said:
If it shows 4-4 in the majors, sure! If its Flannery, you might be overstating the heart suit already. If it's....no certainly can't be!
#8
Posted 2005-March-31, 13:09
If you feel like you have to open 2H/3H/1S on this hand to create action, maybe you should spend some time learning how to play the cards better. A 2H/1S/3H opening bid here is surely likely to create a swing, but one you can no longer control due to you superior card play, nor due to application of skilled bidding inference to side rather or not to compete later. Rather, you will win (or lose) based upon the joker you threw into the auction with the bid.
Now if it is late in a team game and you are behind, ok, you need a swing. A flattish hand will not help, by all means, try to create one. Or if this is last hand of a matchpoint thing and you need one more board to win or place very high? At least you have a reasonable expectation of creating a swing with some unusual activity here. But as for run of the mill bridge? Just do the normal thing here.
I don't mind opening 2H with 6H and 4S, especially in third chair. IF the major honors were reversed (AQ of hearts, Jack of spades), ok 2h would be fine.
Ben
#9
Posted 2005-March-31, 13:18
Of course, I'd never consider bidding on this hand in first or second chair.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#11
Posted 2005-March-31, 14:14
#12
Posted 2005-March-31, 14:18
It was one of the last boards and I was really need a good score to win a tournament.
I openned 1♥. Not everyones choice, but, as we can see from this poll, I am not just one who chose it.
If Partner has ♥ support my hand much better than it looks now, if he has good spades - too. If Partner doesn't have majors, he, probably, will not jump too high.
Bidding follows:
dbl - 1NT - 4♠ - pass - pass - dbl.
Third best contract (my Partner had Kx spades), unlucky distribution, very average declarer play - down 3. 800.
Top? - Not!
Ave- assigned by director, who explained me, I must pass with 7 points or less.
#13
Posted 2005-March-31, 14:18
awm, on Mar 31 2005, 02:18 PM, said:
I don't think you should be seriously worried about that. You have a 7 count, and 2 players already passed. Well, the remaining hcp could be divided 11, 11, 11, but that is not even good enough.
LHO must also be balanced if he is to pass.
Roland
#14
Posted 2005-March-31, 14:42
Hope this has most preempt effect. P will not have 11 or shapely 10.
#15
Posted 2005-March-31, 15:05
olegru, on Mar 31 2005, 03:18 PM, said:
Unless it was clearly stated on the table note, we have another example of an incompetent TD.
"I must pass with 7 points or less".
This is not even a psyche. A light opening perhaps, but a psyche? Far from it!
Roland
#16
Posted 2005-March-31, 15:07
olegru, on Mar 31 2005, 08:18 PM, said:
It was one of the last boards and I was really need a good score to win a tournament.
I openned 1♥. Not everyones choice, but, as we can see from this poll, I am not just one who chose it.
If Partner has ♥ support my hand much better than it looks now, if he has good spades - too. If Partner doesn't have majors, he, probably, will not jump too high.
Bidding follows:
dbl - 1NT - 4♠ - pass - pass - dbl.
Third best contract (my Partner had Kx spades), unlucky distribution, very average declarer play - down 3. 800.
Top? - Not!
Ave- assigned by director, who explained me, I must pass with 7 points or less.
This is a ridiculous decision!
Your opponents were somehow damaged because you had a weaker hand than you promised.
If you had had a few more points and they had gone a further one down it would have been OK I suppose!
Eric
#17
Posted 2005-March-31, 19:06
#18
Posted 2005-April-01, 03:12
#19
Posted 2005-April-01, 03:52
luke warm, on Apr 1 2005, 03:06 AM, said:
The WBF definition of a HUM includes the agreement that an opening of one in a suit may be based on "A king less than average strength". Points schmoints, this is an acceptable opening.
Of course, when playing with a pick-up partner it can't be a problem anyway. But this is probably all irrelevant since the tournament rules rarely prohibit HUMs.
#20
Posted 2005-April-01, 20:01

Help
