55% rebate.
Only scored 5% for this, which was disappointingly unexpected, not because I was in the best contract (I wasn't) but just surprised that there were not more players duplicating it. Not begrudging them. This was hand 12 and I was just above 55% going into it. Ironically I was trying to bid down the middle.
I was a tad heavy for 2C rebid, but not obscenely so. I don't have a GF hand, and if partner can do nothing other than pass 2C I don't expect to make 3N. And if he doesn't pass 2C I get another shout, which I did. The issue is related to insistence on using total points to limit minor suit bids when no fit has been established.
I feel that the 2N rebid over 2C is mis-described. It continues to suggest that I may have only 3 Clubs. I think that if I had values for 2N but only 3 Clubs I would raise 1N to 2N on first rebid. Responder certainly interpreted it as 4+ Clubs, as there is no way that he would want to play in a possible 4-3 Club fit when he has a certain 5-3 Spade fit.
And what about that 5-3 Spade fit? We are informed that GIB distinguishes between MP and IMP scoring in exercising judgement. Scant evidence of that here.
Finally, we are informed that responder has 6-9 total points when bidding 2S. How many values does the 3C bid show? 6-9 total points. I feel that opposite an opener who has shown such a strong hand as is indicated by the 2N bid, we should at least be able to eliminate the maximum holdings from responder when he makes a non-forcing bid in a partscore. As it happens, he had a minimum, which I guessed. But I am not sure whether that the description needs updating or whether he just happened by chance to have a minimum.

Help

s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
