BBO Discussion Forums: My sacrifice promises 24+ hcp? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

My sacrifice promises 24+ hcp?

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2015-February-03, 09:09



Does my sacrifice 5♣ promise 24+ hcp?
And after double,Gib N bid up to 7♣ at all hazards.
0

#2 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,778
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2015-February-03, 09:24

5♣ shows a good hand. Basic principle of "don't bid the same values twice". Or in this case...don't lie about the values you didn't have the first time a second time.
0

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-February-03, 09:51

View PostTylerE, on 2015-February-03, 09:24, said:

5♣ shows a good hand. Basic principle of "don't bid the same values twice". Or in this case...don't lie about the values you didn't have the first time a second time.

North voluntarily bid 4♣; this should show some values. 5♣ doesn't show a desire to play at that level opposite nothing.
0

#4 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,155
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2015-February-03, 13:15

5♣ should show a better hand than what South actually has, but it certainly shouldn't require 24+ HCP!

North has to bid more than 4♣ IMO, it's way too good for 4♣. Should bid 3♠ showing a good hand with good fit along the way to 5♣ IMO.
2

#5 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2015-February-03, 17:03

The problem starts with the 4♣ bid that seems to require only 3+ clubs.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#6 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,530
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2015-February-03, 17:39

View PostBbradley62, on 2015-February-03, 09:51, said:

North voluntarily bid 4♣; this should show some values. 5♣ doesn't show a desire to play at that level opposite nothing.

North should have bid 5♣ straight away- no aces in the majors and 5 clubs limits its level.
0

#7 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-February-03, 21:23

View PostStephen Tu, on 2015-February-03, 13:15, said:

5♣ should show a better hand than what South actually has, but it certainly shouldn't require 24+ HCP!

North has to bid more than 4♣ IMO, it's way too good for 4♣. Should bid 3♠ showing a good hand with good fit along the way to 5♣ IMO.


I agree. Or if not that, certainly 5C. One thing the the programmers need to do immediately is stop GIB from bidding on after having been doubled for penalty. Let it redouble 5C if it is so confident.

This all said Lycier, you are not new with GIB. You should have known you can't bid 5C with this hand.
0

#8 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-February-03, 21:38

View Postiandayre, on 2015-February-03, 21:23, said:

This all said Lycier, you are not new with GIB. You should have known you can't bid 5C2N with this hand.

FYP
0

#9 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-February-04, 15:24

View PostBbradley62, on 2015-February-03, 21:38, said:

FYP


Well I agree, 2NT is not good, but if he had kept quiet the rest of the way, he might have gotten away with it. 5C was suicidal
0

#10 User is online   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,467
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-February-04, 18:37

I ♥ this bidding all the around :D I think GIB would be better off if the game in hand (ie 24+ descriptions) were totally eliminated unless you open 2♣, or double, cue bid, and then bid game by yourself or something like that. It is almost always ridiculous to assume in a competitive auction that a player that bids game has 24+
0

#11 User is offline   1eyedjack 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,575
  • Joined: 2004-March-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2015-February-05, 00:59

The bidding up to 5C is worthy of criticism but that does not excuse the subsequent actions.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.

Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mPosted ImagesPosted ImagetPosted Imager-mPosted ImagendPosted Imageing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.

"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"

"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
0

#12 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2015-February-05, 04:37

View Post1eyedjack, on 2015-February-05, 00:59, said:

The bidding up to 5C is worthy of criticism but that does not excuse the subsequent actions.


I agree.
I have to say that I don't care about winning or losing.
In order to find problem,I should provide its example hand.
0

#13 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2015-February-06, 10:12

View PostStephen Tu, on 2015-February-03, 13:15, said:

5♣ should show a better hand than what South actually has, but it certainly shouldn't require 24+ HCP!

LHO showed a limit raise so this is obviously a sac. I think a 6th club is plenty, it doesn't show extra HCPs.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#14 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-February-11, 12:16

View Posthelene_t, on 2015-February-06, 10:12, said:

LHO showed a limit raise so this is obviously a sac. I think a 6th club is plenty, it doesn't show extra HCPs.
Best I can tell, GIB will sometimes decide to sac, but will never think his partner is doing so.
0

#15 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2015-February-11, 12:19


0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users