Lead problem From BBO tourney
#1
Posted 2005-February-27, 13:00
♠ 97xxx
♥ KJxx
♦ Tx
♣ xx
LHO...RHO
pass..2NT
3♥....3♠
4NT...5♣
6NT
3♥ was transfer, and 4NT RKCB for spades.
Your lead?
#2
Posted 2005-February-27, 15:30
#4
Posted 2005-February-27, 15:46
I hold another 5
I don't see a need to attack with a Heart so the passive Spade lead is looking mighty attractive...
#5 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-February-27, 15:48
#6
Posted 2005-February-27, 15:56
hrothgar, on Feb 27 2005, 04:46 PM, said:
I hold another 5
Are you sure about that? Responder transferred to spades, but then didn't seem to let the partnership get out in 6♠ even if opener had some preference for playing in spades. The transfer might simply have been a misdirection. Or, maybe responder has three kings and figured he could find out everything he wanted to know by setting spades and asking for keycards (whoops, I have a king, I guess that's not it). I don't know, but I'm far from confident that responder actually has spades.
Unlike Free, I'm far from confident that a heart lead kills them even if partner does have the queen. And, a heart lead could easily blow up a trick, possibly declarer's 12th.
I'd probably lead a middle spade, like hrothgar. Mostly because it looks like the lead least likely to give away a trick or take away a guess from declarer.
Tim
#7
Posted 2005-February-27, 15:57
Jlall, on Feb 27 2005, 04:48 PM, said:
You mean dummy can't hold some minor suit kings?
#8
Posted 2005-February-27, 16:20
Jlall, on Feb 28 2005, 12:48 AM, said:
Agreed. They have 5 Spade tricks. With this said and done, a Spade lead isn't going to blow a trick. The Heart lead could very easily be into a tenace...
The Heart lead will work spectacularly well if partner has the Ace. Its likely to break the contract if partner has the Heart Queen soemthing on the side. However, I think that its more likely that the opponents hold the Ace and King of Hearts than that partner holds the Ace or Queen.
I could be wrong, especially given the opponent's Spade length. It would be interestng to see a simulation.
#9
Posted 2005-February-27, 16:28
TimG, on Feb 28 2005, 12:56 AM, said:
hrothgar, on Feb 27 2005, 04:46 PM, said:
I hold another 5
Are you sure about that? Responder transferred to spades, but then didn't seem to let the partnership get out in 6♠ even if opener had some preference for playing in spades. The transfer might simply have been a misdirection.
Guess it is kinda hypocritical for me to trust the opponent's auctions
#10
Posted 2005-February-27, 18:06

Help
