jallerton, on 2014-January-28, 16:48, said:
No, other people have opinions on this matter.
Suppose you haven't won a competition yet, but aspire to do so. Would you want to receive a trophy if and when you do win?
You are right.
Quote
Suppose you don't expect to ever win anything. You might still have a view on what other people should receive when they win.
Not as clear, apart from how much of the budget of an event should be allocated to cash prizes.
Quote
In my county, some of the people who feel strongly about this subject are people who don't tend to win anything.
A member of the county committee has expressed the view that it's difficult to keep track of where all the trophies are, and that it is a lot of effort to persuade the previous year's winners to return the trophy at the appropriate time.
So people who haven't and won't win a trophy want to sell them? I think that it probably matters how much money would be raised. If a really significant amount would be realised, which would allow the county to do something really special for its members, then maybe there is an upside. Is the collection of trophies really worth more than one or two thousand pounds? If not, then just getting rid of them for the sake of not having them seems a wrong-headed thing to do.
If the main objection is the difficulty of keeping track of them, just don't let people take them home. But still present them, have them engraved, and display them at the event (you could even have all of the trophies on display at events. I think that people would be really interested to look at them and see who the past winners were).
For what it's worth, in my county, each major event has a different main organiser, so a particular committee member has to worry about the whereabouts of only one trophy. Unless they are the organiser of the Lederer, which has three trophies.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein