BBO Discussion Forums: GIB isn't a good slam bidder!(2) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GIB isn't a good slam bidder!(2)

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-December-12, 04:09



Have a look at my hand,it is a great pity that we lost grand slam.
As a basic common sense,one of 5N'meaning is to ask partner a question: Do you afford extra tricks? North GIB held ♣ AKQ95,we can regard its decent ♣ suit as a good source of tricks.And bid up to 7S is a very reasonable contract after my 5N.This is a right way of evaluation hand !
So I have to say GIB isn't a good slam bidder!
0

#2 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,530
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2013-December-12, 09:15

View Postlycier, on 2013-December-12, 04:09, said:



Have a look at my hand,it is a great pity that we lost grand slam.
As a basic common sense,one of 5N'meaning is to ask partner a question: Do you afford extra tricks? North GIB held ♣ AKQ95,we can regard its decent ♣ suit as a good source of tricks.And bid up to 7S is a very reasonable contract after my 5N.This is a right way of evaluation hand !
So I have to say GIB isn't a good slam bidder!

A range of 14HCP hands would be good for slam- you just have bid it without great bidding science- low to intermediate human bridge players would be confused too- we have everything- experienced partner did you lie or make a mistake and we shouldn't be in slam.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users