[phoenix214]

This was a fun match actually, as i recall. Our team managed to win the Dutch team in the youngsters, quite the hype, not to mention other factors that were happening there. I think i recall this hand as well, Polak just driving to a grand slam. The boards i do recall were 7 and 13.
On board 7, they pushed up to a grand slam, after 2♠-X(or hearts)-5♠, and were missing ace of diamonds which they didnt suspect.
On board 13, we had misunderstanding with pard on 4th round of biding, where i thought my bid promised a spade fit, while he took it as a spade control. After a while we ended up in 6♥, doubled and i made it. Them being unhappy about our explanations called director, and i gave a weblink to Dan Neils system page for our system for him to check, turns out partner was right

[CSGibson]

manudude03, on 2013-July-20, 14:26, said:

Board 14 of round J20 in the Junior Europeans was rather spectacular. Partner has shown very little in values (0-4 with 0 controls) and at least 3 card support. What do you think here?

IMPs scoring btw.

---

I like a prior poster's point about 5N, with the idea that hearts will play better, perhaps, but I hate the idea of introducing clubs - one of the biggest things I have going for me is that they don't know that they have to keep their 4 clubs to the T instead of 4 hearts to the J or 4 diamonds to the Q.

So I think 5N is a great idea, with the plan of forcing to 7.