Page 1 of 1
When (if ever) do you come in?
#1
Posted 2013-May-23, 07:50
Matchpoints, all vul.
♠AQ3
♥2
♦J764
♣KJ962
Partner deals and passes. P-(1♦) to you.
A bit shy of a textbook 2C overcall, but your side may well want to be in the bidding.
If you don't act, the other side's uncontested auction will be
1♦-1♥
1NT-2♥
Those of you who choose option #2 or #3 in the poll, you may further spell out whether you bid or double in the comments.
♠AQ3
♥2
♦J764
♣KJ962
Partner deals and passes. P-(1♦) to you.
A bit shy of a textbook 2C overcall, but your side may well want to be in the bidding.
If you don't act, the other side's uncontested auction will be
1♦-1♥
1NT-2♥
Those of you who choose option #2 or #3 in the poll, you may further spell out whether you bid or double in the comments.
#3
Posted 2013-May-23, 08:45
At these colours I might prefer to pass. I'm hoping they go down with hearts stacked in partner's hand vs us playing 2♠ on a 3-3 fit if I double.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#4
Posted 2013-May-23, 09:31
I think this is mainly a frequency question: how often do we expect the opponents to be in an 8-card fit in this auction? It we expect a decent fit, then balancing is clearly right. From my experience, the answer to this question is based on the opponents bidding particulars. Do they rebid 2H with 5 or is it a guaranteed 6? Does opener frequently rebid 1N with a singleton in partner's bid suit?
Both opponents have shown limited values, so the question is fits.
PS: I screwed up the poll by voting never because I misread the auction the first time. My poll answer would be: I don't have enough information at this point except to eliminate answers. I would not bid over 1H or 1N, but I might bid over 2H.
Both opponents have shown limited values, so the question is fits.
PS: I screwed up the poll by voting never because I misread the auction the first time. My poll answer would be: I don't have enough information at this point except to eliminate answers. I would not bid over 1H or 1N, but I might bid over 2H.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#5
Posted 2013-May-23, 11:55
2C first
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2013-May-23, 12:11
I always bid 2♣ over 1♦ if it's close - an excellent way to give the opps a chance to end up in the wrong strain. Here we see an added bonus in that the bid solves another problem later in the auction.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
#7
Posted 2013-May-23, 13:48
I also bid 2♣.
If I balance a double over 2♥ then I will play in 2♠ opposite ♠7xxx ♥KQx ♦xx ♣Axxx, probably off when 3♣ has a decent shot.
If I balance a double over 2♥ then I will play in 2♠ opposite ♠7xxx ♥KQx ♦xx ♣Axxx, probably off when 3♣ has a decent shot.
Become yourself.
#8
Posted 2013-May-23, 14:58
broze, on 2013-May-23, 12:11, said:
I always bid 2♣ over 1♦ if it's close - an excellent way to give the opps a chance to end up in the wrong strain.
Catch a negative double on a 4-3 hand, medium values and a 2♥ response from opener on a 4-4 and they are in jail.
Not that this happens often but it never happens if you don't bid 2♣ and other good things can happen including setting the defence.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#9
Posted 2013-May-24, 02:14
Over 1♦ i pass, i am very badly placed if pd bids 2♥ over my 2♣. Which is very likely.
Over 1NT i pass, i am not annoyed to defend 1 NT when they are vuln.
Over 2♥ i double, this DBL the way i play bans pd from bidding spades with less than 4 card (or i would balance with 2 ♠)
Over 1NT i pass, i am not annoyed to defend 1 NT when they are vuln.
Over 2♥ i double, this DBL the way i play bans pd from bidding spades with less than 4 card (or i would balance with 2 ♠)
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#10
Posted 2013-May-24, 03:05
Timo, I do not get it. Which hand do you fear, where partner will bid 2 ♥ over 2 ♣?
If my partner bids here, he has a reason: A good hand in his passed hand context or club support. In both cases, I can find a playable spot sometimes in 2 NT often in 3 ♣.
The downside in 2 ♣ is that they will usually still find their heart fit and sometimes a bad penalty. But I would still choose it and it is not close.
If my partner bids here, he has a reason: A good hand in his passed hand context or club support. In both cases, I can find a playable spot sometimes in 2 NT often in 3 ♣.
The downside in 2 ♣ is that they will usually still find their heart fit and sometimes a bad penalty. But I would still choose it and it is not close.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1

Help
