BBO Discussion Forums: what does 3h show here? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

what does 3h show here?

#1 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,739
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-March-28, 08:11

What type of hand do you expect 3h to be here....examples?

(1d)=p=p=1h
p=3h?


opp opened 1d....
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-March-28, 08:29

It is a matter of partnership agreement.

Either the 3 call is preemptive (are we really worried about third hand backing into this auction after the initial pass?) or it is constructive.

Clearly, 2 would be stronger, showing a penalty pass of 1, but not necessarily showing a fit. So, with a full invitation to game, second hand should cue bid then raise hearts. 3 probably should show a mixed raise type of hand - 4 or 5 hearts, less than a full invitation to game.
0

#3 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-March-28, 08:38

View PostArtK78, on 2013-March-28, 08:29, said:

Clearly, 2 would be stronger, showing a penalty pass of 1


Interesting. I would have thought 2D here was just a standard UCB showing a good heart raise (as such, 3H is pre-emptive; how much so is down to partnership agreement, for me it shows something like xxx QJxx x Axxxx)

ahydra
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2013-March-29, 06:29

3 preeemptive, 2 good raise, but not necessary a pen. double of 1 .
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,655
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2013-March-29, 09:55

under these specific circumstances i prefer the 2d cue to
have several meanings.
1. limit + raise for p overcall
2. opening hand with decent diamonds and probably short in p overcall
(most likely would have passed a reopening x).
3. 6/7 good diamonds with side ace and no fit. (immediate 3d shows the
same suit but little outside).

p generally just rebids their suit if no game interest opposite a limit raise or
bids another suit with extra values and allow p to describe their hand.

for me the 3h bid is still peemptive but my hand will have not much
offense or defense and 4+ in hearts. Qx Kxxxx Qxxx xx. 2h raise tends to be
stronger and more balanced but not good enough to be a limit raise.

We dont make special allowance for openers failure to rebid because they may
very easily pass and 18-19 point hand balanced if they dont see any hope
for game hoping the opps willl overbid.
0

#6 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2013-March-29, 10:04

How could it be preemptive? That makes no sense. One opponent couldn't respond to an opening bid, the other opened 1 then passed over 1. I understand it's not some balanced 13 point raise since that would cuebid, but it still has to be an invitational type of hand. I would take it as a good playing hand like Kxx Jxxxx x Axxx, a limit raise based on shape.

Also saying "by agreement" is a cop out. Who has an agreement about this auction? If you had to apply some agreement though I think it would be logical to consider it the same type of hand as P P 1 P 3, if you have an agreement for that one. That's another auction where there is a more common strong raise available and there is no need to preempt.
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#7 User is offline   dustinst22 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 253
  • Joined: 2010-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Huntington Beach, CA
  • Interests:Spades, Bridge, good food/wine, MMA, classical music, cycling

Posted 2013-March-29, 11:04

Sensible to play 2D as 3c good raise (or even just a good hand that couldnt act over 1d?) and 3H as 4+ good raise?
0

#8 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2013-April-02, 13:26

I would play the same as over (1D) - 1H, maybe 3H should be slightly more constructive and 3D and 2NT are also slightly better.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users