BBO Discussion Forums: ATB and guess the diamonds - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ATB and guess the diamonds

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-October-20, 14:53



Match points
ATB for missing 3NT and also play 4 if you want:

South leads A to make it clear that 4 is the wrong contract, north plays 3 and south quickly puts Q on the table, cover or not?
0

#2 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2012-October-21, 03:03

I would double 2 by west hand. 3 is lousy bid imo. Not sure if that would change the outcome though.

For the play, south showed an Ace and a Queen, opener is down to 10 hcp already and he opened very light with a suit missing AK. I suspect opener has a 6-4 hand for opening with these poor values and then bidding 3, i also think he rates to hold 4 spades more ofthen than holding 4 diamonds, since with side 4 diamonds he could have choosen to open a weak 2. If he has AJxx we are going down anyway, covering only wins if opener has AJx (or Axxx )

I would duck the Q
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#3 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,695
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2012-October-21, 08:17

100% W

2n over 2h a standout. All three side suits stopped 3 card club
support and an invitational hand. 3c doesnt show all that much
and a neg x (while keeping spades in the picture is right only if
we are destined to make exactly 3 spades. If p does not like NT
and has extra values they can always bid 3s on their way to
some number of clubs.

I would also duck the dia Q since the only way this bidding makes much sense
is for rho to hold something like Jx(x) QJxxxxx A(x) Jx and I am not convinced rho
did not psyche 1h.
2

#4 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2012-October-22, 04:58

I would also X as West. If we are playing raptor I would try 2N
1

#5 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-October-22, 06:30

No need to rush to NT with just a single stop, so sure X.

But IMO the partners made another mistake: If 3 did show a hand that strong, they should have found a way to look for 3 NT. Mine had been 3 by East. But maybe he expected much less from partner or 3 shows length for them.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#6 User is offline   ewj 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 2005-April-12

Posted 2012-October-22, 14:26

Yeh west has a clear double of 2 and if North still bid 3 (which they genuinely might not), I suppose East could double that...might be resulting though...but surely that seems reasonable, extras, not masses of defence but if partner passes, how bad can it be.
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users