In my style as a passed hand I will rarely have 6M unless im 6M+4M (I know this is a minority POV), also I wont transfer with only a 5 card suit since 3Nt can easily be bid with a stiff in a M. So does
4C both M (possibly 6S+4H)
4D 5D+5H
4H = 6H+4S
4S = 5S+5C
make sense without any lenghty discussion ?
Those who have a more classic style for weak twos in 2nd seat should probably play transfers here agree ?
Page 1 of 1
(P)-P-(3C)-3NT-(P)-?? passed hand advance
#1
Posted 2012-April-18, 00:09
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#2
Posted 2012-April-19, 15:31
In the absence of a lengthy discussion, I think most pairs will just assume they are playing the same as they play after the same auction without the first two passes. Theoretically, this might not be optimal and maybe some of the bids might never get used, but it's more practical than agreeing something which at least one partner is liable to have forgotten by the time it first comes up several years later.
Page 1 of 1

Help
