1. Favorable, first chair, BBO MBC cross IMPs, don't know the opponents or partner but everyone seems competent or better, you hold
--, AK963, KQ43, QJ64
1H-P-4H-4S
?
2. All, first chair, BBO MBC cross IMPs, you don't know much about these opponents either, you hold
AJ8, AT642, 8, A965
1H-Dbl-2H-3D
?
Page 1 of 1
Playing with randoms 2^31-1 I always get these wrong
#1
Posted 2012-February-18, 20:56
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
#2
Posted 2012-February-18, 21:54
1. If partner's hand strictly showing preemptive hand I bid 5♥, I was wondering how precision players deal with this(when 4♥ could be 3 trumps and enough HCP to play)
2.I pass in case partner want to X with a flat maximal hand with slow ♦ winners, which allows us win plenty of IMPs. In MP where the difference between 100 and 110 is large, the decision is much harder.
2.I pass in case partner want to X with a flat maximal hand with slow ♦ winners, which allows us win plenty of IMPs. In MP where the difference between 100 and 110 is large, the decision is much harder.
#3
Posted 2012-February-19, 02:52
1) 5H
2) X playing maximal doubles, otherwise pass. FWIW if I pass and partner bids 3H, I am bidding game.
2) X playing maximal doubles, otherwise pass. FWIW if I pass and partner bids 3H, I am bidding game.
#4
Posted 2012-February-21, 11:53
5H and pass (it's close-ish to 3H since that's "just competitive" here).
ahydra
ahydra
#5
Posted 2012-February-21, 13:22
1. 5D comes to mind, but then again.. finding pard with xxx xxxxx Axx Kx seems like wishful thinking. Anyway, 5H or 5D depending on how I feel like.
2. Obvious 3H. You have a singleton in opps' suit.
2. Obvious 3H. You have a singleton in opps' suit.
#6
Posted 2012-February-21, 15:52
1) 5♥
2) 3♥
2) 3♥
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem Albert Einstein
#7
Posted 2012-February-24, 19:41
So 5♥ was obvious on the first one. It made by setting up partners *&^&*^%( spades (he had QJ98x, QJxxx, Jxx, --). No swing.
On the second I bid 3♥, because I was afraid double wouldn't be interpreted correctly. The opponents had lost their minds and were in a 7-card fit, so while 3♥ made, 3♦ was going for a number. No swing.
On the second I bid 3♥, because I was afraid double wouldn't be interpreted correctly. The opponents had lost their minds and were in a 7-card fit, so while 3♥ made, 3♦ was going for a number. No swing.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
Page 1 of 1

Help
