Help
http://tinyurl.com/7fklkop
Would you reopen with a double?
Page 1 of 1
Inappriate reopening?
#2
- Group: Admin
- Posts: 22,185
- Joined: 2004-August-21
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-January-09, 16:05
The book bid is X. We don't have any special rules for solid suits like that -- I think the expectation is that simulations will usually deal with them -- so the default rule is to double to show 16+ total points. It needs 19+ TP to bid freely on the 4 level when partner has only shown 6 points.
However, in all my simulation tests, it actually chooses to Pass -- I think all the bidding is making it very pessimistic about partner's hand. Was this a dumb bot?
However, in all my simulation tests, it actually chooses to Pass -- I think all the bidding is making it very pessimistic about partner's hand. Was this a dumb bot?
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,530
- Joined: 2008-December-02
Posted 2012-January-09, 21:28
barmar, on 2012-January-09, 16:05, said:
The book bid is X. We don't have any special rules for solid suits like that -- I think the expectation is that simulations will usually deal with them -- so the default rule is to double to show 16+ total points. It needs 19+ TP to bid freely on the 4 level when partner has only shown 6 points.
However, in all my simulation tests, it actually chooses to Pass -- I think all the bidding is making it very pessimistic about partner's hand. Was this a dumb bot?
However, in all my simulation tests, it actually chooses to Pass -- I think all the bidding is making it very pessimistic about partner's hand. Was this a dumb bot?
Couldn't the book bid be 3S (or 4D if the actual opponents bid was 3S) for all good hands with 16+ total points and not so many HCP overall its already said I have only 3 spades or 3 hearts in my hand.
Page 1 of 1