BBO Discussion Forums: Judgment - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Judgment 3h or 4h?

#1 User is offline   cnszsun 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 720
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Location:CHINA

Posted 2011-December-02, 07:40

Your hand:
♠xx
♥KJ1098xx
♦Kx
♣Qx
Partner opened 1♦, you bid 1♥, partner rebid 1NT, you call?
Michael Sun

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-December-02, 07:45

Invitational range seems clear.

If playing roudi I use roudi

If playing 2 way checkback I bid 2♣ and then over 2♦ not sure if 2♥ or 3♥, I think 3♥ better.
0

#4 User is offline   the_dude 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 224
  • Joined: 2009-November-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida

Posted 2011-December-02, 08:08

3♥ invitational imo. (or whatever mechanism you use to invite). 4♥ is tempting but 7222 hands always seem to have one more loser than you expect.
If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it then how bad a decision could it really be?
1

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-December-02, 08:18

7 losers calls for a FOUR HEART bid :)
0

#6 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,297
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-December-02, 09:59

View PostFluffy, on 2011-December-02, 07:45, said:

Invitational range seems clear.



If playing 2 way checkback I bid 2♣ and then over 2♦ not sure if 2♥ or 3♥, I think 3♥ better.




Ditto, this looks closer to an adjusted 8 loser hand.

2c forcing 2d then jumping to 3h seems clear.
0

#7 User is offline   WrecksVee 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 95
  • Joined: 2003-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland USA

Posted 2011-December-02, 10:07

What form of scoring? What is vul situation?

MP invite is fine.

IMP 4♥ if vul. NV......I know I should invite but I need less than 50% but I agree that 7222 always is worse than expected.....so I check the phase of moon, consult the ceiling, flip a coin and then guess leaning toward 3♥.
"A stopper is neither weak nor strong but thinking makes it so." H. Kelsey
1

#8 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2011-December-02, 17:21

View Postthe_dude, on 2011-December-02, 08:08, said:

3♥ invitational imo. (or whatever mechanism you use to invite). 4♥ is tempting but 7222 hands always seem to have one more loser than you expect.


4♥. Shortens the auction.

When you invite, there is no guarantee partner will go the the right hands.
1. ♠ xxx ♥ Q ♦ Axxx ♣ AKxxx
2. ♠ QJx ♥ xx ♦ AQJx ♣ KJTx
Would pard know which hand is worth a 4♥ call?

Do agree that hands with no singletons or voids are unlucky.
1

#9 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,297
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-December-02, 17:32

View Postjogs, on 2011-December-02, 17:21, said:

4♥. Shortens the auction.

When you invite, there is no guarantee partner will go the the right hands.
1. ♠ xxx ♥ Q ♦ Axxx ♣ AKxxx
2. ♠ QJx ♥ xx ♦ AQJx ♣ KJTx
Would pard know which hand is worth a 4♥ call?

Do agree that hands with no singletons or voids are unlucky.




both examples are easy very easy 4h over an invite.

I only invite because opener could have much worse hands.
0

#10 User is offline   xxhong 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 328
  • Joined: 2010-November-11

Posted 2011-December-02, 19:19

Looks like a 4H bid. You can have good plays vs quite a few minimum hands:
for example: AKx xxx Axx xxxx


View Postcnszsun, on 2011-December-02, 07:40, said:

Your hand:
♠xx
♥KJ1098xx
♦Kx
♣Qx
Partner opened 1♦, you bid 1♥, partner rebid 1NT, you call?

1

#11 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-December-03, 06:12

Jogs, if you invite and partner doesn't know to bid game holding ♥Q, ♦A and ♣AK you should look for a new partner.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-December-03, 15:17

Han, if you keep doing stuff like that, you'll run out of partner is 6 weeks time.
1

#13 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2011-December-03, 20:36

View Posthan, on 2011-December-03, 06:12, said:

Jogs, if you invite and partner doesn't know to bid game holding ♥Q, ♦A and ♣AK you should look for a new partner.

LOL but true.
0

#14 User is offline   jmcw 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 2008-October-15

Posted 2011-December-03, 23:45

Don't invite p to bid a game you should.

4♥
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users