Your bid?
Balancing problem
#1
Posted 2011-July-05, 12:13
Your bid?
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2011-July-05, 12:29
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2011-July-05, 12:43
Partner could be sitting there with a strong unbalanced hand with long clubs. You could be cold for game in any of three denominations.
I recognize that LHO could be the one with the strong hand and you could be rescuing the opps from a bad contract. But I will take that chance.
I bid 1♦. I do not double. Besides the fact that double is more than a bit silly with 74 in the red suits, I don't want to defend 1♣x in any event.
At this vulnerability, passing is only right if (1) you go plus defending 1♣ more than the value of your red suit or NT partial; (2) you go minus 100 and the opps cannot make 9 or more tricks in clubs; (3) you go minus 200 or more; or (4) the opps find a better contract and you can't do anything about it. The first three of these possibilities are pretty remote. The last one might happen, but it seems unlikely.
#4
Posted 2011-July-05, 13:05
#5
Posted 2011-July-05, 14:16
#6
Posted 2011-July-05, 14:47
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#8
Posted 2011-July-05, 17:31
-P.J. Painter.
#9
Posted 2011-July-05, 18:30
Pass is safest for sure, but I don't think you win by playing safe if a reasonable alternative is available.
I'm going for 3♦
#10
Posted 2011-July-05, 18:53
The reason I don't like entering the auction is mainly the possibility of hitting a misfit. Opponents seem to have spades and we won't be able to outbid them; however this might not be so bad since partner is likely to have 4 spades. Also 1♥ looks better than 1♦ if we're not gonna play the hand; but there's a 3-card difference between those suits and it may lead to misunderstandings.
I might regret not bidding because we're vulnerable but spades are such a menace that I prefer to pass and have my 'I'm sorry' ready.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#11
Posted 2011-July-05, 19:02
Hanoi5, on 2011-July-05, 18:53, said:
Long diamonds, weak defense, huge offense, often a swan.
-P.J. Painter.
#12
Posted 2011-July-06, 06:35
Hanoi5, on 2011-July-05, 18:53, said:
Most parterships don't have these bids defined, so 3♦ will be natural (by meta-rules). In theory...
- It's not weak/preemptive because you pass out 1♣ with a weak hand. Besides, since you can pass, you're not preempting anyone here.
- It's not strong (although you can define it as such) because strong hands, as in 15+, dbl first.
- It's not artificial because it's undiscussed and thus must be natural.
The only option left is, logically, natural with an intermediate hand. I.e. 10-14 or so with about 7 cards (with 6 you balance 2♦ only).
#13
Posted 2011-July-06, 06:37
It's a good thing my LHO knew all about "cover an honor with an honor".
-- Bertrand Russell
#15
Posted 2011-July-06, 06:53
I'd have overcalled 1N with the W hand though.
#16
Posted 2011-July-06, 07:21
mgoetze, on 2011-July-06, 06:37, said:
LOL, sometimes, after a 1NT opening I can't decide between 2♣ and 4♣.
Why didn't West overcall 1NT?
#17
Posted 2011-July-06, 08:00
#18
Posted 2011-July-06, 08:25
phil_20686, on 2011-July-06, 08:00, said:
So can I, apparently
#19
Posted 2011-July-06, 08:41
Cyberyeti, on 2011-July-06, 06:53, said:
This is normal to me, and pretty-much dates back to the mid 20th Century with no particular reason for it to have changed.
#20
Posted 2011-July-06, 08:44
phil_20686, on 2011-July-06, 08:00, said:
Imo it's a good 15, not average.

Help

mgoetze asked
IMP pairs. Your bid?
IMO Pass = 10, Diamond bids = 8.
If you protect and partner has
- 3♠ or fewer, then you may have some explaining to do.
- 4♠, then you may survive.
If partner has a fair hand with 5♠ or more, then he would already have bid.