Link to hand
I would have thought the play was obvious enough that my last card was a diamond.
Page 1 of 1
gib gets memory squeezed? so much for perfect memory lol
#2
Posted 2011-March-18, 18:34
I don't see it. AFAIK gib doesn't understand the concept of count on defence? (does it?)
Since E thought it important to hold on to the club 3 there was no perfect count information on this hand, was there?
Since E thought it important to hold on to the club 3 there was no perfect count information on this hand, was there?
#3
Posted 2011-March-18, 18:38
If I was 4603 I'd win the lead, ruff a club, spade back and ruff another club before finessing.
Wayne Somerville
#4
Posted 2011-March-19, 00:17
GIB doesn't know how to make "what-if" inferences like that.
The stupid thing is that GIB is pretty good at GIVING count on defense. Why does it bother if it doesn't make use of it?
Also, if East would simply discard its last club, West WOULD have a complete count. It seems like it's holding on to it to avoid an end-play, but it doesn't have a throw-in card so what's the problem?
The stupid thing is that GIB is pretty good at GIVING count on defense. Why does it bother if it doesn't make use of it?
Also, if East would simply discard its last club, West WOULD have a complete count. It seems like it's holding on to it to avoid an end-play, but it doesn't have a throw-in card so what's the problem?
Page 1 of 1

Help
