[Trumpace]

gnasher, on 2011-March-04, 12:53, said:

If I found myself in some parallel universe where partner doesn't play signalling, I'd consider declarer's play.

I guess if declarer throws a club, partner can tell you have the ♣A and partner can signal count there.
Maybe it is obvious that the signal _has_ to be count.

Anyway, apologies if I have been asking questions with obvious answers, I tend to be in B/I mode most of the time :-)

[JLOGIC]

Phil, on 2011-February-27, 21:01, said:

---

You are vulnerable. Opps are not. You consider a move over 2♠

wat

[gnasher]

Trumpace, on 2011-March-04, 13:54, said:

I guess if declarer throws a club, partner can tell you have the ♣A and partner can signal count there.
Maybe it is obvious that the signal _has_ to be count.

There's only one suit where West can hold anything of value, and this is his second discard. I think that makes it clearly count.

Quote

Anyway, apologies if I have been asking questions with obvious answers, I tend to be in B/I mode most of the time :-)

I didn't say any of the answers were obvious.