BBO Discussion Forums: Defending against multi - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Defending against multi

#21 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-February-07, 06:18

Thank you for all the comments.

I bid 4H and doubled 4S, -790. Those that cue first will probably do better, partner will feel invited to act and you can escape for -300.

Without the double we play that 2S is a cue for hearts and 2NT is natural. After the double I think that 2S should be natural and 2NT should be a heart raise, with the balanced invite you can redouble.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#22 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,828
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2011-February-09, 09:37

View Postgnasher, on 2011-February-03, 13:37, said:

Playing the normal English defence to a Multi, partner isn't particularly limited - just the same range as an overcall over a natural weak two. Some people play that all hands with 16+ start with a double, in which case 2 is limited. However, playing either method I'd want to involve partner in the decision about what to do over 4.

On the next round, if I'd shown a limit raise or better, and one of the opponents bid 4, I'd double to say that I had more than what I'd already shown. Unless I could make a forcing pass, of course.

The "normal English defence to a multi" is Dixon where a 2H overcall is not natural but rather a (limited) take-out of spades with at least 4 hearts.
(-: Zel :-)
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users