Thank you for all the comments.
I bid 4H and doubled 4S, -790. Those that cue first will probably do better, partner will feel invited to act and you can escape for -300.
Without the double we play that 2S is a cue for hearts and 2NT is natural. After the double I think that 2S should be natural and 2NT should be a heart raise, with the balanced invite you can redouble.
Defending against multi
#21
Posted 2011-February-07, 06:18
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#22
Posted 2011-February-09, 09:37
gnasher, on 2011-February-03, 13:37, said:
Playing the normal English defence to a Multi, partner isn't particularly limited - just the same range as an overcall over a natural weak two. Some people play that all hands with 16+ start with a double, in which case 2♥ is limited. However, playing either method I'd want to involve partner in the decision about what to do over 4♠.
On the next round, if I'd shown a limit raise or better, and one of the opponents bid 4♠, I'd double to say that I had more than what I'd already shown. Unless I could make a forcing pass, of course.
On the next round, if I'd shown a limit raise or better, and one of the opponents bid 4♠, I'd double to say that I had more than what I'd already shown. Unless I could make a forcing pass, of course.
The "normal English defence to a multi" is Dixon where a 2H overcall is not natural but rather a (limited) take-out of spades with at least 4 hearts.
(-: Zel :-)

Help
