BBO Discussion Forums: Play in 6NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Play in 6NT Best line?

#1 User is offline   ajm218 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 88
  • Joined: 2003-March-20

Posted 2011-February-09, 03:53



In 6nt on a club lead after a strong nt opening and a 2 response to stayman.

How would you play this?

Anyone able to do a sim to compare some lines?
0

#2 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2011-February-09, 05:41

I would run the club to the 9, unblock the ace of clubs if necessary cross to the QS and play a diamond towards the J. Regardless of the return I can reduce the position to:
x
x
x
K

-
AKx
J
-

In reality we are basically falling back on the major suit squeeze but with extra chances if the KQ diamonds on your right, or if diamonds are 5-2. Seems like the best line by some margin. If rho doesnt fly in when you play a diamond towards the J then he doesnt have KQ, so you should be able to read that position. If the diamonds are 5-2 and the spades 4-2 you just need the heart in the same hand as length in one of the other suits.

So i figure I will make:
Spades 3-3, or Jx spade.
Spade in the same hand as hearts:
diamonds 5-2 with heart in the same hand as diamonds:
diamonds not 5-2 with KQ diamonds with rho, and he holds the long heart.

Think that is about 80%. Anyone got anything better?
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-February-09, 06:17

At trick 2 I'd run 8 from hand. I don't want to make it easy for them to return a diamond, and it's easier to play one back through the ace than into the ace.

If they don't return a diamond, we can come down to
10
x
Ax
K

-
AKx
Jx
-

We can still play Phil's line - cash A then K. Alternatively, if LHO has the spade guard, we can play a double squeeze with diamonds as the pivot - cash K throwing a diamond to squeeze RHO, then cash the top hearts to squeeze LHO.

This post has been edited by gnasher: 2011-February-09, 06:19

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2011-February-09, 10:20

I like the double squeeze line in general. If running the 8 of diamond draws a K or a Q, I would probably reconsider & play the ace of diamonds, then play for a squeeze around hearts (not a double squeeze, since only one opponent guards hearts, but played like one).
Chris Gibson
0

#5 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2011-February-09, 12:38

I've thought about it some more, and what I think is right is as follows: win in hand, cross to a spade, and lead a diamond, putting in the 8 if RHO doesn't play an honor. I then play the ace of diamonds, unblock the club if necessary, play off the top spades, and run clubs, pitching diamonds from hand. This line works if the spade J falls, or if the same hand has 4 spades & 4 hearts, 4 diamonds & 4 hearts, if RHO has the KQx of diamonds and fails to duck an honor & has 4 hearts, or if KQ of diamonds is doubleton.
Chris Gibson
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users