What's your call? IMP Pairs
#1
Posted 2010-October-13, 03:14
♠AKJxxx
♥Qxx
♦Qx
♣xx
Playing a 4-card major natural system, you open 1♠. Auction proceeds:
1♠ - (2♣) - X - (3♣)
3♠ - (4♣) - P - P
?
What do you call here, and why? What other options are there? (Partner's X promises 4 hearts and 8+ points.)
#2
Posted 2010-October-13, 03:41
what else? I overbid my hand slightly last round and partner passed. great! now we can pass in peace.
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2010-October-13, 04:43
partners pass may be forcing.
Your 3S call, showed a hand 15/16-18, partners neg. X, occurring on the
2 level showed +8/9, so it could be argued, that 3S did create a game force,
since our side will have at least 23/24HCP our way.
If you follow this argumant, you may regret your 3S bid.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2010-October-13, 04:52
#5
Posted 2010-October-13, 14:12
But noting that we stretched we have a very easy pass now. .. neilkaz ..
#6
Posted 2010-October-13, 22:11
#7
Posted 2010-October-14, 02:39
The_Hog, on Oct 14 2010, 05:11 AM, said:
I couldn't have said it better.
#8
Posted 2010-October-14, 02:59
As director, I needed a poll to decide whether pass was an LA to 4♠. In the EBU, the rules are that pass must be considered by a significant proportion of players, of whom some might select it: so this one's pretty clear-cut!
I'll get everything sorted.
#9
Posted 2010-October-14, 03:08
The_Hog, on Oct 14 2010, 05:11 PM, said:
I think 3♠ is fair.
Partner asked us to bid at the 2-level without anything extra.
We have a good six card suit. Which is enough to push to the three-level in competition i think.
Bidding 4♠ is over the top though.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#10
Posted 2010-October-14, 03:15
The player who bid 4♠ deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can
#11
Posted 2010-October-14, 03:57
#12
Posted 2010-October-14, 05:16
Fluffy, on Oct 14 2010, 04:15 PM, said:
The player who bid 4♠ deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can
So Fluffy, what do you do with a King, (or an Ace), more? Bid 4 and go off?
#13
Posted 2010-October-14, 06:30
The_Hog, on Oct 14 2010, 11:16 AM, said:
Fluffy, on Oct 14 2010, 04:15 PM, said:
The player who bid 4♠ deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can
So Fluffy, what do you do with a King, (or an Ace), more? Bid 4 and go off?
Well, I suppose it is possible to construct a layout where we have AKJxxx, KQx Qx xx, partner has a neg X and opps have their 2, 3 and 4♣ bids - but it is getting into the realms of relatively unlikely. Also opposite something like xx ATxx ATxx xxx we at least have chances.
#14
Posted 2010-October-14, 06:38
The_Hog, on Oct 14 2010, 11:16 AM, said:
Fluffy, on Oct 14 2010, 04:15 PM, said:
The player who bid 4♠ deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can
So Fluffy, what do you do with a King, (or an Ace), more? Bid 4 and go off?
I don't think it's impossible to have a 3S bid with a range that is about an ace wide, i.e. the difference between the weakest possible hand and the strongest possible hand is about an ace. In bridge you can't always have clear-cut ranges like '15-17 balanced' all the time, especially not in competitive auctions.
Anyway, I think that this 3S is a slight overbid while a 3S with an ace more would be a slight underbid.
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2010-October-14, 17:08

Help
