BBO Discussion Forums: partial pattern relays for balanced hands - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

partial pattern relays for balanced hands

#21 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-September-22, 16:42

straube, on Sep 23 2010, 01:31 AM, said:

I like the ability to reverse relay and had never really thought of them as relay breaks, but maybe they are.

I was just trying to point out an advantage I thought I saw in Abraham's method over Moscito and I didn't mean to offend you.

I'd never really liked Moscito's 1C-1D, 1N because it used up so much room. I'd thought to try to preserve 2D+ continuations so that responder could even then pattern out some of his hands, but he can show far less than after 1C-1D, 1H.

After 1C-1D, 1H-1N then I don't understand which of opener's hands he would want to show. If opener had a minimum balanced hand, wouldn't have have rebid 1N immediately? 1C-1D, 1N?

If I remember Moscito correctly, opener can't show the 3-suited hands and has to bid 1C-1D, 1H. If now 1C-1D, 1H-1N and responder is showing a balanced hand, then perhaps

2C-relays
other-5440s

The relay break after 1♣ - 1♦ normally shows a minimum hand, however there's a very significant advantage to having balanced hands ask, so a large percentage of balanced minimums will choose to ask rather than show. (If the auction starts 1♣ - 1♦, if I have a balanced hand and relay break to 1NT I pretty much have a 15 count or a godawful 16 count)

There are still plenty of minimum hands to show after

1♣ - 1♦
1♥ - 1N
Alderaan delenda est
0

#22 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-September-22, 16:52

Fair enough. When I played Moscito I strained not to rebid 1N...to the point that that rebid was almost but not quite wasted.
0

#23 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-September-23, 01:15

Richard, I think you missed something. Normally 1♣-1♦-1♥ shows extra's. With a balanced minimum, opener will immediately bid 1NT himself limiting his strength to 9-11 QP's. After that, responder can ask, or can show if he also holds a balanced hand.

So basically this case is more applicable:
1♣ - 1♦
1NT - ?
2♣ = relay
2♦+ = min, balanced, showing shape (reversing relays again)

After 1♣-1♦-1♥-1NT opener will rarely reverse relays since he already showed extra's with 1♥, but it's still possible. You could agree he has exactly 12 QP's for example (which saves space later on, no need to ask for QP's and having 4 suits to scan).
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#24 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-September-23, 07:07

He hasn't missed anything. He consciously avoids the sequence 1C-1D, 1N unless he has a 15 or bad 16 because it prevents him from being captain when responder has a shapely hand. I've done similarly.

Btw, if one doesn't care for 1C-1D, 1N to show a balanced minimum, it can instead show a 2-suiter and a 1-suiter...like both majors or one of the minors.
0

#25 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-September-23, 08:35

straube, on Sep 23 2010, 04:07 PM, said:

Btw, if one doesn't care for 1C-1D, 1N to show a balanced minimum, it can instead show a 2-suiter and a 1-suiter...like both majors or one of the minors.

The 1NT response shows EITHER a balanced hand or a 4441.

With this said and done, reordering the relay sequences such that 1N shows a two suiter + a one suiter completely destroys the symmetry of the structure.

Right now, after

1♣ - 1♦
1♥

Bids from 2♣ up show a set of single suited / two suited hands.
A 1♠ response shows a different set of single suited / two suited hand patterns.

After

1♣ - 1♦
1♥ - 1♠
1N - 2♣+

We're able to use precisely the same relay structure that we use after

1♣ - 1♦
1♥ - 2♣+

Your scheme would shift everything down a step which significantly increases the complexity of the resulting structure.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#26 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-23, 09:58

straube, on Sep 23 2010, 08:07 AM, said:

Btw, if one doesn't care for 1C-1D, 1N to show a balanced minimum, it can instead show a 2-suiter and a 1-suiter...like both majors or one of the minors.

Seems like to converge on 2H = SS, 2S+ = reverser, you would have to put two 2-suiters and a 1-suiter, so for example:

1C - 1D - 1N - 2C:

2D: S+D
2H: S
2S+: S+C
foobar on BBO
0

#27 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-September-23, 10:26

The suggestion I gave would put those hands at +0 which is not symmetric with the rest of Moscito (which I believe is +1). As Atul suggested, at +1 we could fit even more hand patterns into the 1N rebid.

My point was not so much to suggest a particular use for 1C-1D, 1N but to suggest that if one is reluctant or sparing with the use of a 1N rebid to show a balanced (or 4441) hand, that 1N might be reassigned to show other patterns.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users