BBO Discussion Forums: partial pattern relays for balanced hands - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

partial pattern relays for balanced hands

#21 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-September-22, 16:42

straube, on Sep 23 2010, 01:31 AM, said:

I like the ability to reverse relay and had never really thought of them as relay breaks, but maybe they are.

I was just trying to point out an advantage I thought I saw in Abraham's method over Moscito and I didn't mean to offend you.

I'd never really liked Moscito's 1C-1D, 1N because it used up so much room. I'd thought to try to preserve 2D+ continuations so that responder could even then pattern out some of his hands, but he can show far less than after 1C-1D, 1H.

After 1C-1D, 1H-1N then I don't understand which of opener's hands he would want to show. If opener had a minimum balanced hand, wouldn't have have rebid 1N immediately? 1C-1D, 1N?

If I remember Moscito correctly, opener can't show the 3-suited hands and has to bid 1C-1D, 1H. If now 1C-1D, 1H-1N and responder is showing a balanced hand, then perhaps

2C-relays
other-5440s

The relay break after 1 - 1 normally shows a minimum hand, however there's a very significant advantage to having balanced hands ask, so a large percentage of balanced minimums will choose to ask rather than show. (If the auction starts 1 - 1, if I have a balanced hand and relay break to 1NT I pretty much have a 15 count or a godawful 16 count)

There are still plenty of minimum hands to show after

1 - 1
1 - 1N
Alderaan delenda est
0

#22 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-September-22, 16:52

Fair enough. When I played Moscito I strained not to rebid 1N...to the point that that rebid was almost but not quite wasted.
0

#23 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-September-23, 01:15

Richard, I think you missed something. Normally 1-1-1 shows extra's. With a balanced minimum, opener will immediately bid 1NT himself limiting his strength to 9-11 QP's. After that, responder can ask, or can show if he also holds a balanced hand.

So basically this case is more applicable:
1 - 1
1NT - ?
2 = relay
2+ = min, balanced, showing shape (reversing relays again)

After 1-1-1-1NT opener will rarely reverse relays since he already showed extra's with 1, but it's still possible. You could agree he has exactly 12 QP's for example (which saves space later on, no need to ask for QP's and having 4 suits to scan).
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#24 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-September-23, 07:07

He hasn't missed anything. He consciously avoids the sequence 1C-1D, 1N unless he has a 15 or bad 16 because it prevents him from being captain when responder has a shapely hand. I've done similarly.

Btw, if one doesn't care for 1C-1D, 1N to show a balanced minimum, it can instead show a 2-suiter and a 1-suiter...like both majors or one of the minors.
0

#25 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-September-23, 08:35

straube, on Sep 23 2010, 04:07 PM, said:

Btw, if one doesn't care for 1C-1D, 1N to show a balanced minimum, it can instead show a 2-suiter and a 1-suiter...like both majors or one of the minors.

The 1NT response shows EITHER a balanced hand or a 4441.

With this said and done, reordering the relay sequences such that 1N shows a two suiter + a one suiter completely destroys the symmetry of the structure.

Right now, after

1 - 1
1

Bids from 2 up show a set of single suited / two suited hands.
A 1 response shows a different set of single suited / two suited hand patterns.

After

1 - 1
1 - 1
1N - 2+

We're able to use precisely the same relay structure that we use after

1 - 1
1 - 2+

Your scheme would shift everything down a step which significantly increases the complexity of the resulting structure.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#26 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-23, 09:58

straube, on Sep 23 2010, 08:07 AM, said:

Btw, if one doesn't care for 1C-1D, 1N to show a balanced minimum, it can instead show a 2-suiter and a 1-suiter...like both majors or one of the minors.

Seems like to converge on 2H = SS, 2S+ = reverser, you would have to put two 2-suiters and a 1-suiter, so for example:

1C - 1D - 1N - 2C:

2D: S+D
2H: S
2S+: S+C
foobar on BBO
0

#27 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-September-23, 10:26

The suggestion I gave would put those hands at +0 which is not symmetric with the rest of Moscito (which I believe is +1). As Atul suggested, at +1 we could fit even more hand patterns into the 1N rebid.

My point was not so much to suggest a particular use for 1C-1D, 1N but to suggest that if one is reluctant or sparing with the use of a 1N rebid to show a balanced (or 4441) hand, that 1N might be reassigned to show other patterns.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users