BBO Discussion Forums: precision semipositive - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

precision semipositive

Poll: your call (23 member(s) have cast votes)

your call

  1. pass (15 votes [65.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 65.22%

  2. x (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 2[sp] (8 votes [34.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 34.78%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-September-17, 14:12

Scoring: IMP

1♣-p-2♥-??


1♣ showed 16+ with any shape and 2♥ showed 4-7 points with 6 hearts.

If you pass, would you overcall when NV? If you pass even then, could you approximately explain what criteria you apply? This is a situation that I've never given thought to so before. Maybe because it is not so important.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   bucky 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 430
  • Joined: 2010-May-18

Posted 2010-September-17, 14:23

Ask yourself this: if RHO is dealer and opened 2♥, would you overcall? Now does the knowledge that LHO has 16+ change your action?
 
 
0

#3 User is offline   Flameous 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 2008-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oulu, Finland
  • Interests:How to find out shape below 2NT.

Posted 2010-September-17, 14:25

Won't bid, I don't see much reason for it. They likely have game, we are unlikely to sac and I'd just tell how to play the hand. Of course I direct the right lead but I don't find it worth it. NV it's borderline, if I was 5134 it would be much more clear to bid.
0

#4 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-17, 16:12

please pass
0

#5 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-September-17, 16:13

bucky, on Sep 17 2010, 03:23 PM, said:

Ask yourself this: if RHO is dealer and opened 2♥, would you overcall? Now does the knowledge that LHO has 16+ change your action?

Sounds like good logic to me.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-September-17, 16:20

to be honest I was not really thinking of acting on this particular hand (even though the well-known guy on BBO bid 2♠, I don't generally like his style of bidding) but it got me thinking what handtypes should act here?

is it just practically the same category of hands that acts over

1NT-p-2♦-?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2010-September-18, 01:02

bucky, on Sep 17 2010, 03:23 PM, said:

Ask yourself this: if RHO is dealer and opened 2♥, would you overcall? Now does the knowledge that LHO has 16+ change your action?

Of course LHO having 16+ changes your action. More specifically, it means that partner knows that we are not trying for game (they have showed 20+), so he knows to take my bid competitively. In contrast, over their weak 2♥, it's important for us to look for our spade game, so both my overcall and partner's advances will be generally aimed more constructively.

I bid 2♠ for the lead, although I'm not strongly in favor of it with this hand/colors. Add the J♠ and I want to overcall here almost always and I still wouldn't overcall directly with my poor 11 count over a weak 2♥.
0

#8 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-September-18, 01:15

Quote

is it just practically the same category of hands that acts over

1NT-p-2♦-?


It's much closer to the set of hands that acts over a weak two opener, than to the set that acts after that auction. 2D is unlimited; but it's still more limited than over a 1950s-era 1NT-p-2H, since the 1C opener is much less defined shapewise than over 1NT.

As mentioned, you're not worried about game your way - but you are at the 2-level and you need to be prepared to survive having a strongish hand on your left not being able to nail you too easily.

The posted hand I would bid NV-only-and-MP-only.
0

#9 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-18, 02:12

gwnn r u srs?
OK
bed
0

#10 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-September-18, 02:19

Quote

is it just practically the same category of hands that acts over

1NT-p-2♦-?


No, it's more dangerous as LHO doesn't need to have any hearts.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#11 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2010-September-18, 05:10

Pass. Too risky and pointless to bid. I don't see bidding for the lead. We are on lead against hearts ourselves, so it's only relevant when LHO misfits hearts, and then bidding seems particularly dangerous.
Michael Askgaard
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users