kgr, on Aug 6 2004, 09:20 AM, said:
2D-(2S)-X
Ok. It will be take out. What does it show? 2 card H can probably be sufficient?
And: any justification for playing it take out?
More likely that you have the penalty DBL then partner?
=======
The was a very bad hand. I don't know the exact hand anymore, but the bidding did go (no agreements on what DBL would be!!):
2D-(2S)-3H
3NT-4NT
3H: I hope partner has 6 card H. Then it could even be 4.
3NT: partner did have 6 card spades and a strong weak hand (this is around 10 HCP)
4NT: partner did think a bid before bidding 3NT. If we would have bid it immediatly then it could have been 20-22 HCP. Now i felt like I had to bid 4NT.
Result: 4NT -1 (3NT would have been a top).
Well, I suspect 2
♠-X would have been a top... but that is a different issue...
This hand and your result illustrates why 2
♠X should be takeout. IF you guess to bid 3
♥ (pass/correct), what is your partner to do with weak hand and spades? 3NT reallly needs to be the big balanced hand. Also note, if he has the big balanced hand, he can also pass the 2
♠-X as well.
Now for you are more likely to have a penalty double hand issue. IT is true, after your partner has defined his hand (weak two.. presumably hearts), you may desire to double 2
♠. But here is what happens.. if you have a bunch of spades and a good hand, your partner iwll be very short in spades. When the bidding comes back to him, he will have an option to dbl (I have hearts) or pass... 2NT of course would be balanced hand and 3 of a minor the minor thing. If he doubles, you can lick your lips and now pass. IF not, well, you didn't have enough to force to game, and maybe they belonged in a minor.
Ben