Whoa or Go?
#1
Posted 2010-July-28, 00:45
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#2
Posted 2010-July-28, 00:51
#3
Posted 2010-July-28, 02:18
So it depends on the way you play 3 ♥ here.
If this is competetive- like Josh and all* experts play it- you have an easy pass.
If it is invitational like some lols play it: Accept the invitation.
* all is always an overbid, but maybe this time it is not.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2010-July-28, 02:23
I realize partner may be stretching but still we can scramble 10 tricks opposite some pretty weak hands with those kings being often well placed.
To solve (?!) those problems some people play good/bad 2NT here, not to say I recommend it, just pointing out.
#5
Posted 2010-July-28, 02:57
#6
Posted 2010-July-28, 04:44
#7
Posted 2010-July-28, 05:18
Its interesting that this auction is treated quite differently than 1NT (2♠). In principle it would be possible to play Lebensohl or good/bad 2NT or similar here.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#8
Posted 2010-July-28, 05:23
#9
Posted 2010-July-28, 05:54
MFA, on Jul 28 2010, 06:23 AM, said:
Do you also play that
1♦ 1♥
2♣ 2♥
is invitational ?
If yes, is responder supposed to jump to 2♥ with 4♠+6♥ and weaker than invite?
#10
Posted 2010-July-28, 06:58
mich-b, on Jul 28 2010, 01:54 PM, said:
MFA, on Jul 28 2010, 06:23 AM, said:
Do you also play that
1♦ 1♥
2♣ 2♥
is invitational ?
If yes, is responder supposed to jump to 2♥ with 4♠+6♥ and weaker than invite?
Yes & yes. With 4-6-2-1 responder could also bid 1♥ and then take a preference to diamonds, or if it is a reasonable hand live with 1♥ then 2♥ although partner would expect a better hand.
Being able to invite while staying on the 2-level is great, when there is no guarantee of a fit. 1♥ then 3♥ invitational is really awful.
#11
Posted 2010-July-28, 09:24
A J9xxxxx Qxx xx Hearts were 22 and the diamond J onside.
We have talked about G/B2N but not added it yet so I think I will take another look at it.
Thanks for the replies.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#12
Posted 2010-July-28, 09:26
Cascade, on Jul 28 2010, 06:18 AM, said:
Well there is a difference - opener has probably denied 3 hearts (in most styles of support doubles), so there is less need for a forcing 3♥ bid.
#13
Posted 2010-July-28, 09:32
#14
Posted 2010-July-28, 09:56
I would bid 4♥ with that hand, not 3♥, you bid your hand well.
7 card suits are gold.
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2010-July-28, 10:33
The_Hog, on Jul 28 2010, 03:57 AM, said:
Even when playing g/b 2NT, 3♥ is not normally played as forcing. It would be signoff / invitational.
#16
Posted 2010-July-28, 20:58
I don't see anything wrong except the opponents !@#$$%^^ 2♠ bid.
You just can't raise without sending the message to pard that they have to sit there like a lump and never compete. On these colours, my 3♥ bid might be hoping to escape for down a couple undoubled.
What is baby oil made of?

Help

1♣ (P) 1♥ (1♠)
1N (2♠) 3♥ (P)
?