This thread didn't receive a lot of attention but a recent response by Michael Rosenberg in MSC (August 2010, Problem {b}) made me think of it... here's the hand:
Obviously a funny auction and the panel goes on to wonder whether it's a psyche or RHO just made a mistake or something.
Rosenberg's response reads: "Double. South should pretty much make the same call as after '(1
♠)-P-(P)-?' The hand is a little too strong for two diamonds, so double then three diamonds over partner's two hearts or three spades over his three hearts."
If I'm reading this correctly it seems that Rosenberg DEFINITELY has a lower standard for doubling and bidding, since this hand seems pretty bottomish to me, maybe I'm wrong. But if partner bids 3
♥ over my double I'm in a world of pain since my
♦ suit is a POS. Where do our tricks come from? 4
♥ would almost certainly be better, but partner still needs a fair number of hearts.
Probably doubling gives us the best chance to get to game, and maybe even the right game. So he could be right... For my part I'd just balance and unimaginative 2
♦ over (1
♠)-P-(P)-
1♦-P-P-Dbl
2♦-2♥-P-2♠
P-3♦-P-3♥
P-3N-All Pass