BBO Discussion Forums: What is the carding system of GIB ? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What is the carding system of GIB ? whether my high discard encouraging

#1 User is offline   wctw 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 2010-July-20

Posted 2010-July-20, 00:52

Hi,

Time and again my high discard for encouraging does not seem to be understood by GIB

Why and what can be done.

What exactly the carding system followed by GIB

Simply saying 3/5 is of no help to me as I need the complete details

Can Rain help me here

Thomas
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-July-20, 05:08

GIB uses random carding.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   calm01 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 2010-July-08

Posted 2010-July-20, 17:50

We currently just need to accept that at the current status, GIB is a very poor partner when defending and just laugh it off. I do.

Hope you can see the funny side of the following.

GIB often makes random signals and seems to ignore high for encouraging, low for encouraging. high-low for a even number wanting a ruff, reverse length signals for ruffing ...

It is not just the lack of much signalling or signalling capacity or awareness be it attitude or count, GIB makes random leads too.

Even the Rueful Rabbit (RR) would not find a lead of x from AQx in a side suit against 5Hx to allow me to make an impossible contract.

Also RR would not lead a sude suit singleton holding AKQxxxx hearts with the opponents ended in 4D in an auction suggesting I had zero points (the actual case) let alone the Ace of the singleton suit.

To make you fall about laughing. my charmingly erratic robot partner did not even have a trump to ruff with!

We need, perhaps, to accept that GIB cannot defend very well at the moment but will get better over time.

I believe correcting GIB bidding must come first else we will be defending more often than we should when partnering a charmingly erratic bridge computer profram.
0

#4 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2010-July-20, 18:17

I believe GIB is mostly giving count. But for example with 4 cards, that means playing the second-lowest, followed by the lowest.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0

#5 User is offline   wctw 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 2010-July-20

Posted 2010-July-20, 22:02

Thanks for all info.

Have always wondered why GIB which counts very well does not card well but never thought there are so many loopholes still to be improved upon.

All the same they are better partners than the average humans in bringing home the bid contract !
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users