BBO Discussion Forums: responding to mini-multi - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

responding to mini-multi

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2004-July-30, 09:01

Two interesting hands came up yesterday:

AQ
KQx
AJxx
AQxx

Ax
KJxx
x
AKQxxx

Both times partner opened 2D, mini-multi, and both times I enquired, partner showing a minimal hand with exactly five hearts. With which hand(s) would you go past game?

Our range is about 5-10 pts, we were playing pairs and were vulnerable both times.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2004-July-30, 09:10

The club suit in hand 2 is a powerful source of tricks...
If I have methods to find a singleton/void in partner's hand, I'll use this before committing to 6H. Otherwise, I want to play there.

Hand 1 should probably be content to contract for game.
Too much can go wrong...
Alderaan delenda est
0

#3 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2004-July-30, 09:11

The second one only. First one even 4H is at risk if pard has, say,

xx
AJTxx
xxx
xxx
0

#4 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2004-July-30, 16:29

must be my personality, i'd take a nice long peek with both hands, but i agree #2 is awesome
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#5 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2004-July-31, 00:54

To make slam we need 12 tricks (this may be obvious, but it is surprising how many people seem to forget this when bidding).

I can see 12 likely tricks on hand 2 (5 hearts, 6 clubs and a spade) so a slam try is clearly indicated. On hand 1, we need an awful lot from partner to make 12 tricks. I suupose, if I could find out below game level that partner had a 4+ club suit headed by the king, then I might head for slam, but without that, 12 tricks seem a distant prospect.

Eric
0

#6 User is offline   Trpltrbl 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,230
  • Joined: 2003-December-17
  • Location:Ohio
  • Interests:Sailing, cooking, bonsaitrees.

Posted 2004-July-31, 18:49

I go with 2nd hand for sure.
With first hand I would think for a while and try to find if pd has what it takes for slam.

Mike :D
“If there is dissatisfaction with the status quo, good. If there is ferment,
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
0

#7 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2004-August-01, 08:34

1st hand is only worth game imo. Partner can't have the right cards to finesse everything and get to 12 tricks...
2nd hand is clear slam try! 9 card trumps (good trumps!), a long suit which is likely to run and a stiff, ruffing value in the short-trump hand...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users