opps open 1 sapde
partner makes a takeout double, rho passes
what do you answer with
akjx
xx
xxx
jxxx
Page 1 of 1
partner doubles
#2
Posted 2010-June-14, 16:30
1N. Not really a problem.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#3
Posted 2010-June-14, 17:12
i bid 3d, i cant get back to my hand if partner is short and the tenaces in dummy are exposed
the bidding went
1s-dbl-pass-3diamond
pass-pass- dbl-pass
3s-p-p-dbl
all pass
it was down several and score 96 percent
the bidding went
1s-dbl-pass-3diamond
pass-pass- dbl-pass
3s-p-p-dbl
all pass
it was down several and score 96 percent
#4
Posted 2010-June-15, 04:56
If you write 96 % in your collum, there are three possibilities:
1. You are insane and got lucky
2. The opps are insane and you got lucky.
3. You bid/played a hand better then anybody else on this planet.
I still wait for 3 to happen.
1 NT ihad been clear cut/ 3 Diamond was insane, mabye they had been insane too with their bids, what do I know.
1. You are insane and got lucky
2. The opps are insane and you got lucky.
3. You bid/played a hand better then anybody else on this planet.
I still wait for 3 to happen.
1 NT ihad been clear cut/ 3 Diamond was insane, mabye they had been insane too with their bids, what do I know.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2010-June-15, 05:43
I would surely bid 1NT.
I don't think this is the right line of thinking. But even if we follow it, then either partner has only 3 diamonds and it is a disaster in 3♦ or he has 4 and we have a reentry to the hand on the fourth round.
(I assume the minors were reversed, and we have ♦Jxxx ♣xxx, not ♦xxx ♣Jxxx)
babalu1997, on Jun 15 2010, 01:12 AM, said:
i bid 3d, i cant get back to my hand if partner is short and the tenaces in dummy are exposed
I don't think this is the right line of thinking. But even if we follow it, then either partner has only 3 diamonds and it is a disaster in 3♦ or he has 4 and we have a reentry to the hand on the fourth round.
(I assume the minors were reversed, and we have ♦Jxxx ♣xxx, not ♦xxx ♣Jxxx)
Michael Askgaard
#6
Posted 2010-June-15, 08:39
--------------------
"again easy/..once i know....what the heck my suits are."
mike777
"again easy/..once i know....what the heck my suits are."
mike777
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#7
Posted 2010-June-15, 08:44
Hey Lu,
What's wrong with 1NT? Surely you would rather have five diamonds for the 3♦, maybe sometimes you will have to bid 3♦ on a fourcard suit, but here you have a perfect 1NT bid.
What's wrong with 1NT? Surely you would rather have five diamonds for the 3♦, maybe sometimes you will have to bid 3♦ on a fourcard suit, but here you have a perfect 1NT bid.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#8
Posted 2010-June-15, 09:05
helene_t, on Jun 15 2010, 09:44 AM, said:
Hey Lu,
What's wrong with 1NT? Surely you would rather have five diamonds for the 3♦, maybe sometimes you will have to bid 3♦ on a fourcard suit, but here you have a perfect 1NT bid.
What's wrong with 1NT? Surely you would rather have five diamonds for the 3♦, maybe sometimes you will have to bid 3♦ on a fourcard suit, but here you have a perfect 1NT bid.
i bid 3 diamonds because i had some defense in their bid suits and it was the only 4 card suit jxxx
and also i have never seen anything good happening when i bid nt in these situations, the opps will lead other suits, and i might not even get to those spades
yes roland, #2, the opps were indeed insane, my rho dbled holding nothing but 2 diamonds and 2 sapdes
and also when people bid nt that way when i am the opp, i forgo the 4th best, i lead 3 card suits and they are bamboozzled
maybe it is my life in palookadom
Page 1 of 1

Help

