Imp's:
Pass - (1♠) - Pass - (1NT)
Pass - (Pass) - X* - (Pass)
2♣ - (Pass) - Pass - (2♦)
???
*=Huddle
What information does the huddle convey?
Page 1 of 1
Quick reply needed
#1
Posted 2010-June-05, 07:18
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#2
Posted 2010-June-05, 07:22
It suggests to me that partner has some borderline takeout double of 1♠. Just why it's borderline is unclear.
For ruling purposes, I'm not sure it conveys anything.
For ruling purposes, I'm not sure it conveys anything.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#3
Posted 2010-June-05, 07:30
Borderline reopening a little more likely to be mis-shaped than just weak.
#4
Posted 2010-June-05, 07:38
Thank you, hoping for more replties.
The bidder in turn has 2hcp. (Opponents are competent.) Does this change anything?
The bidder in turn has 2hcp. (Opponents are competent.) Does this change anything?
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#5
Posted 2010-June-05, 07:39
what bidder? huh. and which opponents?
anyway isnt this double commonly played as a good hand with values in spades?
anyway isnt this double commonly played as a good hand with values in spades?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2010-June-05, 07:43
gwnn, on Jun 5 2010, 03:39 PM, said:
what bidder? huh. and which opponents?
anyway isnt this double commonly played as a good hand with values in spades?
anyway isnt this double commonly played as a good hand with values in spades?
The bidder who is in turn (Question-marks)
The opponents of that bidder.
That would seem like an obvious possibilety with 2 hcp.
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#7
Posted 2010-June-05, 11:35
In my methods, the balancing doubler has an opening hand with spade length and/or offshape for immediate takeout double. The 2C bidder of course bids unless he figures that 1NX with an overtrick is cheaper than bidding. The break in tempo by the doubler does not suggest any particular holding; the only thing I an see is uncertainty whether he should balance. I don't see the problem.
#8
Posted 2010-June-05, 11:40
Thank you all for your replies.
My ruling ended up along the lines you suggested.
It would probably have done that anyway, but as the ruling was in favour of a close friend, it felt nice to have back-up.
My ruling ended up along the lines you suggested.
It would probably have done that anyway, but as the ruling was in favour of a close friend, it felt nice to have back-up.
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#9
Posted 2010-June-05, 11:48
As peachy said, I would take it as a good hand with spade length. Partner's thinking may mean one of:
-he doesn't have that good a hand
-he is thinking about the possibility that I could misinterpret
I am awesome and my partners know that so option 2 is out
As partner doesn't really promise ♣ support, I would be reluctant to bid 3♣ here with out without the UI.
-he doesn't have that good a hand
-he is thinking about the possibility that I could misinterpret
I am awesome and my partners know that so option 2 is out
As partner doesn't really promise ♣ support, I would be reluctant to bid 3♣ here with out without the UI.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2010-June-05, 12:07
Maybe the hurdle suggests that doubler had to think about what agreement they have wrt this double.
Most likely I would let the result stand. OK, if this pair has a clear understanding that it is (say) a penalty double, then partner is under ethical pressure to pass since the hurdle suggests that doubler doesn't hold and ideal hand for a penalty double.
Most likely I would let the result stand. OK, if this pair has a clear understanding that it is (say) a penalty double, then partner is under ethical pressure to pass since the hurdle suggests that doubler doesn't hold and ideal hand for a penalty double.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
Page 1 of 1