BBO Discussion Forums: bridge problem from romania - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

bridge problem from romania

#21 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,386
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2010-May-18, 04:25

Free, on May 18 2010, 04:42 AM, said:

kenrexford, on May 17 2010, 03:32 PM, said:

Free, on May 17 2010, 08:59 AM, said:

This hand is not only about trumps...

♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.

Interesting problem. If LHO has KJx and pops King, he then can force a ruff in dummy and promote his Jack.
~snip~

I probably misunderstand. But when would LHO pop his ♠K? Under the Ace? If he does, he'll still only make 1 ♠ trick, so contract made. :unsure:

You cash the A, cross back to hand, lead towards the Q, he flies in with the K and forces you to ruff with the Q promoting the J.
0

#22 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-May-18, 04:47

points according to the book

-three clubs at tricks 2-4: 5 points
-finesse at trick 3: 3 points
-Ace of trump at trick 2 then three trumps: 1 point
-otherwise: 0

if East ruffs with an honour we sluff the diamond and finesse against the other honour, if he ruffs low we overruff and play a spade to the 8.

it's a nice solution that i never would have found (i just finessed at trick 3) but I am not sure it's correct.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#23 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2010-May-18, 04:59

Hmm is the book line really better than the finesse at trick 3?
The finesse loses against ♠K singleton with RHO. The book line loses whenever RHO has ♠Hx and at most 2 clubs (he should ruff the third club low).

Edit: I guess the book assumes RHO will ruff high when he can. Well from Kx is is really obvious to ruff low. I think from Jx good players will also find it without giving anything away.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0

#24 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2010-May-18, 05:17

Looks like books answers are mixed up imo.
0

#25 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-May-18, 05:23

Cyberyeti, on May 18 2010, 11:25 AM, said:

Free, on May 18 2010, 04:42 AM, said:

kenrexford, on May 17 2010, 03:32 PM, said:

Free, on May 17 2010, 08:59 AM, said:

This hand is not only about trumps...

♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.

Interesting problem. If LHO has KJx and pops King, he then can force a ruff in dummy and promote his Jack.
~snip~

I probably misunderstand. But when would LHO pop his ♠K? Under the Ace? If he does, he'll still only make 1 ♠ trick, so contract made. :unsure:

You cash the A, cross back to hand, lead towards the Q, he flies in with the K and forces you to ruff with the Q promoting the J.

That's not gonna happen. If no honour falls, I'll play 3 rounds of ♣, not another round of ♠! I'll return to my hand later on with ♥Q to play on ♠s.
If an honour falls, it's safe to play ♠Q.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users