bridge problem from romania
#1
Posted 2010-May-15, 08:44
AQ8
AK42
A
AQ953
T97543
QJ8
72
K6
N opens at unfavourable 1♣ promising 17 points
1♣-3♦-3♠-p
4♦-p-4♠-p
6♠-p-p-p
3♠ was GF 4♦ was forcing, almost always with fit.
West leads a diamond.
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2010-May-15, 09:01
It wins with spades 2-2; Kxx - x and even with spades 4-0.
I guess that if it was that simple it wouldn't make this forum though.
#3
Posted 2010-May-15, 09:11
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#4
Posted 2010-May-15, 09:40
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#5
Posted 2010-May-15, 09:40
#6
Posted 2010-May-15, 09:42
Hanoi5, on May 15 2010, 04:40 PM, said:
Neither line loses to ♠Kxx in West. After ♠A, dropping the jack, you cross to hand, ruff a diamond, and lead a trump from dummy.
#7
Posted 2010-May-15, 11:04
#8
Posted 2010-May-15, 11:06
gnasher, on May 15 2010, 10:42 AM, said:
Hanoi5, on May 15 2010, 04:40 PM, said:
Neither line loses to ♠Kxx in West. After ♠A, dropping the jack, you cross to hand, ruff a diamond, and lead a trump from dummy.
But cashing ♠A loses to ♠KJx with West.
#9
Posted 2010-May-15, 13:19
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#10
Posted 2010-May-17, 07:12
This keeps control and avoids the risk of crossing to the closed hand, losing a Spade finesse, and suffering a ruff.
RichM
#11
Posted 2010-May-17, 07:24
RichMor, on May 17 2010, 02:12 PM, said:
This keeps control and avoids the risk of crossing to the closed hand, losing a Spade finesse, and suffering a ruff.
RichM
That loses to KJx on the left, KJxx on the left, or singleton K in either hand. It only gains over the spade finesse when RHO has 2065/2056 with ♠Kx.
#12
Posted 2010-May-17, 07:59
♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.
#13
Posted 2010-May-17, 08:32
Free, on May 17 2010, 08:59 AM, said:
♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.
Interesting problem. If LHO has KJx and pops King, he then can force a ruff in dummy and promote his Jack.
If everyone follows to the spade, with no honor, then the question is percentages. Clubs need to be 3-3 OR the person with two clubs only needs to have started with the Kx in trumps.
-P.J. Painter.
#14
Posted 2010-May-17, 08:50
Free, on May 17 2010, 02:59 PM, said:
♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.
Compared with the spade finesse, that gains when LHO has ♠K singleton, but loses when he has Jx and a doubleton club, or a spade void.
Given that singleton king is as likely as a void, that doesn't sound much of a bargain to me.
#15
Posted 2010-May-17, 09:50
gnasher, on May 17 2010, 08:24 AM, said:
RichMor, on May 17 2010, 02:12 PM, said:
This keeps control and avoids the risk of crossing to the closed hand, losing a Spade finesse, and suffering a ruff.
RichM
That loses to KJx on the left, KJxx on the left, or singleton K in either hand. It only gains over the spade finesse when RHO has 2065/2056 with ♠Kx.
Right.
I need to clean my glasses before I look at play problems. Thought South had the Spade J.
RichM
#16
Posted 2010-May-17, 10:06
It looks like you are always down when righty holds ♠KJx(x). That is 3 of 16 possible spade layouts. ♠A and another from hand looks like it wins against all 13 other layouts. So how could this be improved on?
-gwnn
#17
Posted 2010-May-17, 10:21
billw55, on May 17 2010, 05:06 PM, said:
It looks like you are always down when righty holds ♠KJx(x). That is 3 of 16 possible spade layouts. ♠A and another from hand looks like it wins against all 13 other layouts. So how could this be improved on?
As Cherdano pointed out two days ago, that line loses to KJx onside, because LHO can win ♠K and force dummy. It also loses to a spade void on the right.
#18
Posted 2010-May-17, 10:39
gnasher, on May 17 2010, 11:21 AM, said:
ah, clever, I missed that post. Thanks
... hmmm ...
So back to low to the Q first then cash the A? That gains v. KJx(x) and loses to bare K on the right, which seems like a good trade.
-gwnn
#19
Posted 2010-May-17, 11:44
gnasher, on May 17 2010, 07:50 AM, said:
Free, on May 17 2010, 02:59 PM, said:
♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.
Compared with the spade finesse, that gains when LHO has ♠K singleton, but loses when he has Jx and a doubleton club, or a spade void.
Given that singleton king is as likely as a void, that doesn't sound much of a bargain to me.
Yes, but a finesse of the 8 loses whenever RHO has any singleton honor, which is twice as likely as a void (using your numbers, not mine). I think the best line is to cash the ace of trump. If an honor falls, you are home. If not, then 3 rounds of clubs pitching the diamond. You win if clubs are 3-3, or if the person with short clubs has the Kx of spades originally, or if RHO has short clubs and spades.
That sounds like a lot of chances to me.
Edit: just realized that Gnasher is probably not finessing the 8, but the Q instead, coming back to the hand if trump are 4-0, and then finessing again, forcing an honor. That's probably a better line after all.
#20
Posted 2010-May-18, 03:42
kenrexford, on May 17 2010, 03:32 PM, said:
Free, on May 17 2010, 08:59 AM, said:
♠A, and if no honour falls I continue with 3 rounds of ♣ trying to discard my ♦.
Interesting problem. If LHO has KJx and pops King, he then can force a ruff in dummy and promote his Jack.
~snip~
I probably misunderstand. But when would LHO pop his ♠K? Under the Ace? If he does, he'll still only make 1 ♠ trick, so contract made.

Help
