Going down.
#1
Posted 2010-April-20, 08:07
Qxx
Axxxx
AKxx
A
RHO opens 4S. Your call?
#2
Posted 2010-April-20, 08:17
x (whatever the partnership agrees it to be), then pass partners 5♣, raise anything else to slam.
#3
Posted 2010-April-20, 08:45
#6
Posted 2010-April-20, 09:00
I hope Ant is.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2010-April-20, 09:13
Phil, on Apr 20 2010, 04:00 PM, said:
Nah, I just have no judgement.
But it's post on the BBO forums or continue the Thesis, so I might as well look foolish here
#8
Posted 2010-April-20, 09:58
Otherwise, I guess I try a "convertable values" double, and live with 5C. It will not be a 4-1 fit, and not likely a 5-1. With two places to play, CHO can try 4NT. With a sort-of balanced hand, he will pass the double.
#9
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:01
aguahombre, on Apr 20 2010, 10:58 AM, said:
Playing with those rules I would definitely make a "penalty" double.
#10
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:05
#11
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:25
hanp, on Apr 20 2010, 09:07 AM, said:
Qxx
Axxxx
AKxx
A
RHO opens 4S. Your call?
X>pass>>>4NT
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#12
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:42
If partner is 1-6 or 2-6 in the blacks this will probably work out poorly.
A big thing is I expect almost the entire field to X (if the 4S bid is normal) and pass. If the 4S bid is not normal, the field will be much better placed than us also. Basically I think we're in a bad spot so it's worth it to gamble, plus it's not that horrible of a gamble.
#13
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:46
Jlall, on Apr 20 2010, 11:42 AM, said:
If partner is 1-6 or 2-6 in the blacks this will probably work out poorly.
A big thing is I expect almost the entire field to X (if the 4S bid is normal) and pass. If the 4S bid is not normal, the field will be much better placed than us also. Basically I think we're in a bad spot so it's worth it to gamble, plus it's not that horrible of a gamble.
agreed, altho I am not so sure that partner will bid with most hands with a stiff spade....unless he has unusual shape, he will usually pass with very weak hands. I wouldn't expect him to bid with, say, x Qxxx Jxxx Jxxx.
If he bids 5♣, I hope to look unworried as I pass, while silently willing LHO not to double.
#14
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:56
#15
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:58
Partner had something like xx J10 87xx KQ8xx. What should he do? (of course we know now what we want partner to do, but try to ignore that
#16
Posted 2010-April-20, 11:01
#17
Posted 2010-April-20, 11:26
hanp, on Apr 20 2010, 11:58 AM, said:
Partner had something like xx J10 87xx KQ8xx. What should he do? (of course we know now what we want partner to do, but try to ignore that
I think he should pass too. But I think the 17 count is an automatic pass over 4♠ as well.
Judging from everyone's comments, I believe I have a different opinion about this hand.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#18
Posted 2010-April-20, 11:49
As advancer, I'd bid 4NT in reply to the double.
#19
Posted 2010-April-20, 11:51
#20
Posted 2010-April-20, 12:12
hanp, on Apr 20 2010, 11:58 AM, said:
Partner had something like xx J10 87xx KQ8xx. What should he do? (of course we know now what we want partner to do, but try to ignore that
Ugh...and while I fully understand why we are (eventually) given the actual hands, I almost always have the same problem: I am not at all sure what I would do at the table with the advancing hand, since I already know what would probably be best.
Thus at the table I might, as advancer, pass (not enough shape/strength to want to contract for 11 tricks), bid 5♣ (I'd rather play in clubs than diamonds opposite say 2=4=4=3 on some layouts...I may be pitching diamond losers on hearts, as an example, or 4N: I'd rather play in a 4-4 or 4-5 diamond suit than a 5-2 club fit.
So, since I cannot be sure what I would really do....ugh summaries it nicely
(Doing the best I can, I think he should pass, and my second choice would be 4N, but, like I say, I cannot be objective)

Help
