2NT-3C-3D-3NT.
no blame 1
#2
Posted 2010-April-19, 19:12
I show C-short after Stayman response 4C.
Now partner's 4D is enough to try key ask.
#3
Posted 2010-April-20, 02:52
2NT-3NT asks partner to start bidding 4-card suits in ascending order. It'll probably go 2N-3N-4♦-6♦.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#4
Posted 2010-April-20, 03:22
if you have the option to go looking for a minor suit fit, being
able to stop in 4NT, I guess it is worth a try, but otherwise I
think that the blame to goes to the methods.
We would end up in 3NT.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2010-April-20, 03:31
Maybe 4♣ as minor suit ask if opener can show a 5-card diamonds. But I am resulting now. In practice I wouldn't bother.
#6
Posted 2010-April-20, 03:40
Hanoi5, on Apr 20 2010, 03:52 PM, said:
2NT-3NT asks partner to start bidding 4-card suits in ascending order. It'll probably go 2N-3N-4♦-6♦.
♠ Kxx
♥ KJ8
♦ AQ5x
♣ AK3
♠ AJT6
♥ A753
♦ 9764
♣ 4
2NT 3NT
4D 6D
Same sequence, not a great contract!
I would have played 3NT unless playing a relay system.
#7
Posted 2010-April-20, 04:57
2N-3C
3N (2 spades, not more than 3 hearts)-4D (nat 4 cards +)
4H (RKCB)-5C (2 without)
6D
#9
Posted 2010-April-20, 07:01
I think Ron Klinger has one such gadget on his book "5-card major stayman".
#12
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:04
#13
Posted 2010-April-20, 10:08
#14
Posted 2010-April-20, 13:41
But, it is far from clear that we should be using it here: we have a combined 29-30 count, with no assurance of even one 8 card fit.
And the methods essentially commit us to 4N or 5suit.
I think, in real life, unless stuck in a match, late, I'd just bid 3N.
When you try to justify reaching every good contract, you end up, in real life, reaching too many bad ones.
#15
Posted 2010-April-21, 22:06
I can't think of any system that can specify those honors below 5NT.
if the ♦AQJxx were ♦AKQxx (subtracting an outside Q) i prefer 1♦ -> 3♦ forcing or 1♦ -> 2♥/2♠ -> 3♦
#16
Posted 2010-April-21, 23:07
#17
Posted 2010-April-21, 23:53
peachy, on Apr 22 2010, 12:07 AM, said:
It will cost if xxxx opposite whatever partner raises with expecting you normally have a 5 card suit (KJxx say) turns out to be an inferior trump suit...

Help
