BBO Discussion Forums: forcing or non forcing? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

forcing or non forcing?

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-April-17, 03:20

1♣-2♦-p-2♠ is "rebiddable ♠, 14+", yet gib passed it
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2010-April-17, 08:53

On a similar note, can we please have responses to weak 2s be forcing?
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users