Help
Corrected!!!! T♣ instead of the King!!!!
KJxx Qx AK Txxxx
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥)
?
This post has been edited by Phil: 2010-April-16, 16:30
Page 1 of 1
pfft
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,094
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2010-April-16, 15:18
IMPs, vulnerability unknown.
Corrected!!!! T♣ instead of the King!!!!
KJxx Qx AK Txxxx
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥)
?
Corrected!!!! T♣ instead of the King!!!!
KJxx Qx AK Txxxx
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥)
?
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,525
- Joined: 2009-March-30
- Gender:Male
Posted 2010-April-16, 15:26
3nt
OK
bed
bed
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,214
- Joined: 2007-December-16
- Location:Pasadena, CA
Posted 2010-April-16, 15:43
Would have opened 1N.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,611
- Joined: 2006-March-18
Posted 2010-April-16, 15:44
rogerclee, on Apr 16 2010, 04:43 PM, said:
Would have opened 1N.
yup
#5
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2010-April-16, 15:45
Maybe they play weak NT.
What I don't understand is a bidding problem with no vulnerability. AFAIK vulnerability is important, especially when considering whether to crack them or bid 3N.
What I don't understand is a bidding problem with no vulnerability. AFAIK vulnerability is important, especially when considering whether to crack them or bid 3N.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,094
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2010-April-16, 15:45
Rob F, on Apr 16 2010, 04:44 PM, said:
rogerclee, on Apr 16 2010, 04:43 PM, said:
Would have opened 1N.
yup
Me too, but the hand was given to me.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,214
- Joined: 2007-December-16
- Location:Pasadena, CA
Posted 2010-April-16, 16:40
It looks like the hand has been corrected to an obvious pass at all colors.
#8
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2010-April-16, 16:43
Yes thank you for the correction, much easier now.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#9
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2010-April-16, 16:44
el paso
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,214
- Joined: 2007-December-16
- Location:Pasadena, CA
Posted 2010-April-16, 16:58
As a side note I think it might be good to play in this specific auction:
x = short hearts
pass = exactly 2 hearts
4H = 3 hearts
Thoughts? (I mean good from a theoretical perspective, not from a practical one.)
x = short hearts
pass = exactly 2 hearts
4H = 3 hearts
Thoughts? (I mean good from a theoretical perspective, not from a practical one.)
#11
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2010-April-16, 17:03
rogerclee, on Apr 16 2010, 05:58 PM, said:
As a side note I think it might be good to play in this specific auction:
x = short hearts
pass = exactly 2 hearts
4H = 3 hearts
Thoughts? (I mean good from a theoretical perspective, not from a practical one.)
x = short hearts
pass = exactly 2 hearts
4H = 3 hearts
Thoughts? (I mean good from a theoretical perspective, not from a practical one.)
Maybe if it's a forcing pass which I think is not clear (I mean over the anticipated 3♠ bid).
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,814
- Joined: 2009-July-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:New Orleans
Posted 2010-April-16, 17:14
Phil, on Apr 16 2010, 04:18 PM, said:
IMPs, vulnerability unknown.
Corrected!!!! T♣ instead of the King!!!!
KJxx Qx AK Txxxx
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥)
?
Corrected!!!! T♣ instead of the King!!!!
KJxx Qx AK Txxxx
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥)
?
Well if X is a suggestion to partner to play 3♥ I do that
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,214
- Joined: 2007-December-16
- Location:Pasadena, CA
Posted 2010-April-16, 17:22
jdonn, on Apr 16 2010, 04:03 PM, said:
rogerclee, on Apr 16 2010, 05:58 PM, said:
As a side note I think it might be good to play in this specific auction:
x = short hearts
pass = exactly 2 hearts
4H = 3 hearts
Thoughts? (I mean good from a theoretical perspective, not from a practical one.)
x = short hearts
pass = exactly 2 hearts
4H = 3 hearts
Thoughts? (I mean good from a theoretical perspective, not from a practical one.)
Maybe if it's a forcing pass which I think is not clear (I mean over the anticipated 3♠ bid).
Regardless of whether we are in a force the points are:
1) Partner might be prevented from bidding 4H when it's wrong and might also find some good decisions to play 5m.
2) We will defend more accurately often.
3) We will get more penalties and get 3Sx vs 3N decisions right more often.
4) We can no longer show a minimum raise of hearts that is willing to defend 3S.
(I assume without discussion, people play x = like a 3H bid).
#14
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2010-April-16, 17:41
Oh yeah I was a little brain dead since we have a free action over 3♥. So no comment.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,094
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2010-April-16, 17:45
Pass seems normal enough. Pass - 4C by pard - pass. Now?
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#16
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2010-April-16, 22:39
Phil, on Apr 16 2010, 06:45 PM, said:
Pass seems normal enough. Pass - 4C by pard - pass. Now?
You mean 3S-4C? Or they passed the cue...
I would bid 4H now
#17
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,094
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2010-April-17, 08:19
Jlall, on Apr 16 2010, 11:39 PM, said:
Phil, on Apr 16 2010, 06:45 PM, said:
Pass seems normal enough. Pass - 4C by pard - pass. Now?
You mean 3S-4C? Or they passed the cue...
I would bid 4H now
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥);
pass - (pass) - 4♣ - (pass);
?
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#18
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,640
- Joined: 2009-February-16
Posted 2010-April-17, 08:48
Of course I don't cooperate with partner's slam try. I hope 4H is a suggestion to play, not a cue, so I bid that.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
#19
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2010-April-17, 13:47
Phil, on Apr 17 2010, 09:19 AM, said:
Jlall, on Apr 16 2010, 11:39 PM, said:
Phil, on Apr 16 2010, 06:45 PM, said:
Pass seems normal enough. Pass - 4C by pard - pass. Now?
You mean 3S-4C? Or they passed the cue...
I would bid 4H now
1♣ - (1♠) - 2♥ - (3♥);
pass - (pass) - 4♣ - (pass);
?
lol
Page 1 of 1