BBO Discussion Forums: Less tricky 4S - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Less tricky 4S

#21 User is offline   sathyab 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 575
  • Joined: 2006-November-07

Posted 2010-April-08, 11:23

Phil, on Apr 8 2010, 10:44 AM, said:

(ignore - use Gwnn's link)

Obviously pard gave this a weak effort.

At the time I thought Fluffy's original line (♠K from hand) was pretty reasonable without the benefit of a lot of study.

Joining the discussion really late here. Let's say you play the ♠K. LHO takes the Ace and forces you again. When play the ♥Q he doesn't cover (and that's single dummy defense if LHO is paying attention) when you try to run ♦s he ruffs with ♠T and you can't make the hand any more can you ?
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..."
0

#22 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-April-08, 11:28

sathyab, on Apr 8 2010, 06:23 PM, said:

Joining the discussion really late here. Let's say you play the ♠K. LHO takes the Ace and forces you again. When play the ♥Q he doesn't cover (and that's single dummy defense if LHO is paying attention) when you try to run ♦s he ruffs with ♠T and you can't make the hand any more can you ?

After he forces us a second time, we just play ♠Q, spade.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users