I'm sort of curious how folks would view this auction.
Partner starts with a strong 1NT. RHO bids a natural 2♣, over which you double (Stayman, Negative -- probably doesn't matter which). LHO raises clubs (3♣).
First, when Opener/partner bids 3♦, what do you expect this to show? Be as specific as necessary.
Second, after 3♦ is passed to you, what would 3M show? What about 4♣? How about 5♣? Any other options worth mentioning for what it shows?
Page 1 of 1
Jacked to the Three-Level
#1
Posted 2010-April-02, 14:17
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#2
Posted 2010-April-02, 16:31
partner shows 5+ good diamonds and his strength should be fitted well with the law "diamonds+points is at least 21", of course with very good diamonds it's OK to have 20 but probably not 19. I would expect opener not to have a 4 card major.
Responder's 3M is therefore Smolen?? And his club bids are good raises of diamonds I guess.
5C shows a void but should not be exclusion.
Responder's 3M is therefore Smolen?? And his club bids are good raises of diamonds I guess.
5C shows a void but should not be exclusion.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2010-April-02, 16:36
gwnn, on Apr 2 2010, 05:31 PM, said:
Responder's 3M is therefore Smolen??
That was my first thought too, but I wonder if it could be a try for 3NT. Is opener expected to bid 3N instead of 3D with any kind of club stopper?
#4
Posted 2010-April-02, 17:08
I haven't discussed and absent that, I would assume at the table with a partner from the US that 3D shows 5+ diamonds and denies 4-card major. Pass would deny both 4-card major and 5+ card diamonds. Don't know what Dbl would possibly mean. And 3NT is out of the question when responder is completely unknown strength and shape.
This is a good topic for partnership discussion.
This is a good topic for partnership discussion.
#5
Posted 2010-April-02, 18:26
I was kind of thinking about the Smolen idea, and it seems like perhaps a flexible smolen makes some sense. In other words:
3♥ = five spades OR punt.
3♠ = five hearts.
3NT = to play.
But, then I tried unwinding 3♥, and I have some difficulty.
So, I thought more about what "could be." It seems like reversing 3♥ and 3NT meanings has some merit, in theory.
3♥ = punt/waiting
3♠ = five hearts, club stop
3NT = five spades, club stop
This seems better, somehow. More flexible. After 3♥, Opener could bid 3NT with clear direction or 3♠ as needing some club help. After 3♠, Responder could probably decline 3NT either naturally or by transfers to majors, with 4♣ possibly as a choice (looking for Moyse?).
Of course, this would need discussion, but the club-stopper-unwind problem seems substantial.
3♥ = five spades OR punt.
3♠ = five hearts.
3NT = to play.
But, then I tried unwinding 3♥, and I have some difficulty.
So, I thought more about what "could be." It seems like reversing 3♥ and 3NT meanings has some merit, in theory.
3♥ = punt/waiting
3♠ = five hearts, club stop
3NT = five spades, club stop
This seems better, somehow. More flexible. After 3♥, Opener could bid 3NT with clear direction or 3♠ as needing some club help. After 3♠, Responder could probably decline 3NT either naturally or by transfers to majors, with 4♣ possibly as a choice (looking for Moyse?).
Of course, this would need discussion, but the club-stopper-unwind problem seems substantial.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
Posted 2010-April-02, 18:37
Yes agree that with your partner. Then the next time it goes
1NT 2♣ X 3♦
P P
And you have a misunderstanding about whether the same agreement applies or not please post an ATB thread so we all get to see.
1NT 2♣ X 3♦
P P
And you have a misunderstanding about whether the same agreement applies or not please post an ATB thread so we all get to see.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
Page 1 of 1

Help
