BBO Discussion Forums: Jacked to the Three-Level - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Jacked to the Three-Level

#1 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2010-April-02, 14:17

I'm sort of curious how folks would view this auction.

Partner starts with a strong 1NT. RHO bids a natural 2, over which you double (Stayman, Negative -- probably doesn't matter which). LHO raises clubs (3).

First, when Opener/partner bids 3, what do you expect this to show? Be as specific as necessary.

Second, after 3 is passed to you, what would 3M show? What about 4? How about 5? Any other options worth mentioning for what it shows?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-April-02, 16:31

partner shows 5+ good diamonds and his strength should be fitted well with the law "diamonds+points is at least 21", of course with very good diamonds it's OK to have 20 but probably not 19. I would expect opener not to have a 4 card major.

Responder's 3M is therefore Smolen?? And his club bids are good raises of diamonds I guess.

5C shows a void but should not be exclusion.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2010-April-02, 16:36

gwnn, on Apr 2 2010, 05:31 PM, said:

Responder's 3M is therefore Smolen??

That was my first thought too, but I wonder if it could be a try for 3NT. Is opener expected to bid 3N instead of 3D with any kind of club stopper?
0

#4 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2010-April-02, 17:08

I haven't discussed and absent that, I would assume at the table with a partner from the US that 3D shows 5+ diamonds and denies 4-card major. Pass would deny both 4-card major and 5+ card diamonds. Don't know what Dbl would possibly mean. And 3NT is out of the question when responder is completely unknown strength and shape.

This is a good topic for partnership discussion.
0

#5 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2010-April-02, 18:26

I was kind of thinking about the Smolen idea, and it seems like perhaps a flexible smolen makes some sense. In other words:

3 = five spades OR punt.
3 = five hearts.
3NT = to play.

But, then I tried unwinding 3, and I have some difficulty.

So, I thought more about what "could be." It seems like reversing 3 and 3NT meanings has some merit, in theory.

3 = punt/waiting
3 = five hearts, club stop
3NT = five spades, club stop

This seems better, somehow. More flexible. After 3, Opener could bid 3NT with clear direction or 3 as needing some club help. After 3, Responder could probably decline 3NT either naturally or by transfers to majors, with 4 possibly as a choice (looking for Moyse?).

Of course, this would need discussion, but the club-stopper-unwind problem seems substantial.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#6 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-April-02, 18:37

Yes agree that with your partner. Then the next time it goes

1NT 2 X 3
P P

And you have a misunderstanding about whether the same agreement applies or not please post an ATB thread so we all get to see.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users