BBO Discussion Forums: Slam auction? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Slam auction?

#21 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-April-03, 06:30

As Fred, show shape (bal 2NT here) first. Maybe loses the perfect controls slam. But always puts the other non-bal rebids on firm ground.
Essentially, where is ambiguity allowed? In every rebid? In one specific rebid(here 2NT)?
0

#22 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-April-03, 07:35

the example hand is a 20 on zar scale whereas even mikeh's recent unfortunate hand is a 11 :rolleyes:
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#23 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,857
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-April-03, 08:40

gwnn, on Apr 3 2010, 08:35 AM, said:

the example hand is a 20 on zar scale whereas even mikeh's recent unfortunate hand is a 11 :rolleyes:

?

As far as I know, you need 26 Zarpoints to open, in other words,
even if you weaken this req., the hand is below opening strength.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#24 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-April-03, 09:04

yes I know. as you might have seen from my previous post I agree with that.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users