BBO Discussion Forums: Normal false preference auction? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Normal false preference auction? Or does this tend to show better hearts?

Poll: My call is (24 member(s) have cast votes)

My call is

  1. 3 Spades (I'd always do this if 2-2 in majors here) (19 votes [79.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 79.17%

  2. 3 Spades (my T9 looks better than my 52) (5 votes [20.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.83%

  3. Pass (I expect pard's hearts to usually be better than his spades) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   jonottawa 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,025
  • Joined: 2003-March-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON

Posted 2010-April-01, 09:05

Here's a simple one that may not be all that interesting:

Favorable, IMPs, 4th seat

♠T9 ♥52 ♦AQ87652 ♣J7

P - 1♠ - 2♣ - P
P - 2♥ - 3♣ - 3♦
P - 3♥ - P - ?
"Maybe we should all get together and buy Kaitlyn a box set of "All in the Family" for Chanukah. Archie didn't think he was a racist, the problem was with all the chinks, dagos, niggers, kikes, etc. ruining the country." ~ barmar
0

#2 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-April-01, 09:34

3S, partner could easily be 6-5. This isn't a false preference it's a real preference..
0

#3 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-April-01, 09:52

yup
OK
bed
0

#4 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-April-01, 10:59

Jlall, on Apr 1 2010, 10:34 AM, said:

3S, partner could easily be 6-5. This isn't a false preference it's a real preference..

at a minimum or even possibly 66 to be bidding over 3♦
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#5 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-April-01, 11:04

3S. But I would have had to take this pref at a higher level than three. Partner would probably have bid 4H, not 3 after my neg double :D
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#6 User is offline   jonottawa 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,025
  • Joined: 2003-March-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON

Posted 2010-April-01, 12:20

Hmmm, looks to be unanimous.

What does 2♥ show here in your 2/1 methods? Can it be 5=4=2=2 min? Can it be 5=4=1=3 min? Does it promise/deny extras?

I thought 2♥ strongly suggested a 5-bagger with a minimum hand. I thought 3♦ strongly suggested a suit that could play opposite a singleton. I felt reluctant to overrule partner who had already shown a 5th ♥, who had heard my complete lack of interest in playing in a major, and who had declined to play in my 'play opposite singleton' suit. Guess I over/under-thought the hand.
"Maybe we should all get together and buy Kaitlyn a box set of "All in the Family" for Chanukah. Archie didn't think he was a racist, the problem was with all the chinks, dagos, niggers, kikes, etc. ruining the country." ~ barmar
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users