ashdown4, on Apr 1 2010, 09:42 PM, said:
In Roger's scenario (nice ha lead) a trump shift at trick 2 looks anti percentage. It is quite possible that the rest of the hand for declarer is just a spade guess. E.g. he may have KQTxxxx Q x AKxx and is about to finesse ST in hopes of an overtrick. Spade continuation would be pretty suboptimal then.
On the auction given my best guess would be that declarer is 7=1=1=4 with less than solid spades and at least one high honors in clubs. On most such layouts club and diamond shift seem to work about the same.
After the
♥A, I can't see any other card but a
♠. The reason being holding the
♣Qxxx and
♠J9. If declarer has any entry to dummy, his
♣ losers are going to vanish along with the contract by the looks of things. The one possible entry we can deny him is by playing a
♠ with the possibility it may cost a trick. If declarer has access to dummy it is doubtful the
♣Q will pick up a trick and the
♠J9 looks only to be helping declarer by falling under higher honours.
Where the
♠ return will cost, is if you reduce your
♠ tricks from 2 to 1 and declarer does not have the
♣A but does have access to dummy. In that case the only lead to get the contract down is a
♣? If it comes down to a choice between a
♠ and a
♣ from that holding, I would strongly favour the
♠.
I await the grand canyon being pointed out amongst this, but at present can see nothing else.
bridge is never always a game of exact, for those times it's all about percentages, partner and the opponents.