R/W, MP, Fourth Seat
Q9762 Q6 AQJ962 void
P 2N P ?
GIB thought 6N was the percentage action here.
Page 1 of 1
GIB!!
#2
Posted 2010-March-09, 05:37
Could be. At least opps won't make a ruff.
You don't have room (nor methods, I suppose) to show you two suits followed by exclusion with both pointed kings counting.
You don't have room (nor methods, I suppose) to show you two suits followed by exclusion with both pointed kings counting.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#3
Posted 2010-March-09, 07:00
Is this an indictment of GIB's bidding, or GIB's assessment of how most of his partners cope with such auctions over 2NT?
I mean, how many people have left GIB in a cue bid?
I mean, how many people have left GIB in a cue bid?
#4
Posted 2010-March-09, 11:31
cardsharp, on Mar 9 2010, 08:00 AM, said:
Is this an indictment of GIB's bidding, or GIB's assessment of how most of his partners cope with such auctions over 2NT?
I mean, how many people have left GIB in a cue bid?
I mean, how many people have left GIB in a cue bid?
GIB should be neither assessing his partners nor punishing new partners for prior partners' stupidity.
#5
Posted 2010-March-12, 01:41
This has been fixed and will be active with the next release of GIB. Probably shortly after the NABCs are completed.
Page 1 of 1

Help
