Bidding goes 1♥ by partner, 2♦ by you and now LHO comes in with 4♠. Partner now bids 4NT. What do you think he has? What do you think is the best treatment of this sequence?
Edit: Forgot to add, playing SAYC. Would this change if it was Acol? What if it was 4 card majors with a 15-17 NT? Would it make any difference if you were playing 2/1 instead?
Page 1 of 1
Bidding sequence best treatment?
#1
Posted 2010-March-08, 18:24
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#2
Posted 2010-March-09, 01:26
I think it depend on your definition for double.
If double is take out, you need (?) 4 Nt as natural.
If double is cards, well, what do I know. Define 4 NT according to your wishes.
IF double is penalty, 4 NT is a strong raise to 5 ♦. I would not define it as blackwood, but if this is easier for you, you can use it in the "common" way.
If double is take out, you need (?) 4 Nt as natural.
If double is cards, well, what do I know. Define 4 NT according to your wishes.
IF double is penalty, 4 NT is a strong raise to 5 ♦. I would not define it as blackwood, but if this is easier for you, you can use it in the "common" way.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2010-March-09, 02:05
We play that 4NT in competition over RHO 4M bid, is takeout with 2 places to play, the specific suits depend on the preceding sequence.
In your example I would expect opener to have either 6-4 in the rounded suits, or long ♥ with ♦ tolerance (6-3, maybe even 6-4 or 7-3).
In your example I would expect opener to have either 6-4 in the rounded suits, or long ♥ with ♦ tolerance (6-3, maybe even 6-4 or 7-3).
#4
Posted 2010-March-09, 04:38
mich-b, on Mar 9 2010, 08:05 AM, said:
We play that 4NT in competition over RHO 4M bid, is takeout with 2 places to play, the specific suits depend on the preceding sequence.
In your example I would expect opener to have either 6-4 in the minors, or long diamonds with ♥ tolerance (6-3, maybe even 6-4 or 7-3).
In your example I would expect opener to have either 6-4 in the minors, or long diamonds with ♥ tolerance (6-3, maybe even 6-4 or 7-3).
Well, yes that was what partner meant (and I guessed it correctly at the table) but it does seem a bit weird after he has opened and I have made a 2/1? As compared to after 4N over a 4M opening.
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#5
Posted 2010-March-09, 04:56
If playing Acol, you are clearly not in a forcing pass situation. This would mean that double would should not be strict penalty. In 2/1, pass is forcing so the standard meaning of dbl is penalty. In SAYC I am not sure but I think pass would be forcing.
In any case I think 4NT is best played as two or three places to play. If pass is forcing, it would show a minimum since a strong hand would pass. If pass is not forcing, a slammish hand with hearts only could bid 4NT then 5♥, but that is confusing since if you bid 5♦ and p then 5♥ it shows hearts and clubs, not substantial extras.
So it's easier if pass is forcing.
In any case I think 4NT is best played as two or three places to play. If pass is forcing, it would show a minimum since a strong hand would pass. If pass is not forcing, a slammish hand with hearts only could bid 4NT then 5♥, but that is confusing since if you bid 5♦ and p then 5♥ it shows hearts and clubs, not substantial extras.
So it's easier if pass is forcing.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#6
Posted 2010-March-09, 06:59
I would suppose 4NT showed interest in slam in diamonds or hearts and hoping to hear a club cue bid.
#7
Posted 2010-March-09, 07:48
i think pass forcing, dbl cooperative
in either sa or 2/1, a 2 over 1 promises a rebid, make the rebid, dble if you can
of course for the pass to be forcing your opening has to have 2 defensive tricks.
but i can see those who open 11 pointers aceless balanced wonders who could not abide a forcing pass
in either sa or 2/1, a 2 over 1 promises a rebid, make the rebid, dble if you can
of course for the pass to be forcing your opening has to have 2 defensive tricks.
but i can see those who open 11 pointers aceless balanced wonders who could not abide a forcing pass
Page 1 of 1

Help

