[PhantomSac]

no wayyy

[jdonn]

FYI you don't have a right to frea speach here. You do however have a right to prove you don't know what a monopoly is.

[inquiry]

PhantomSac, on Feb 23 2010, 04:00 PM, said:

no wayyy

Justin is right. The thread that was removed (at least temporarily) was done so for a lot of reasons, none of which had to do with MisterE speaking out against the BBO Monopoly. To be honest, other than some rambling about Lycos and BBO going their way, I had no idea he was attacking BBO. His suggestion was reviewed by uday, who in part agreed with him, and gave his opinion.

You can still read uday's response in my comments about the removal of that thread at this link.... Public notice of the thread removal

As you may note in that thread, I mentioned some additional (very mild) administrative action. The result of which was an inappropriate response aimed directly to me which I took offense at, so I exercised even additional "monopoly power", no doubt speeding BBO's path towards Lycos.

[PhantomSac]

Wow he got banned, that's awesome haha.

[jdonn]

Anyone who didn't log on the past few hours missed the whole saga, that seems unfair.

[kenrexford]

BBO is the Man?

Wow.

I mean, I have notice a one-world-government feel to BBO. All this smells like League of Nations or United Nations control of bridge playing, and stuff.

When I found out about the monopoly, I started looking into things. Strange, but the name "Gitelman" is extremely curious. Apparently, Sir Gitell-Mann was a Prussian knight of the Templar movement who originally introduced monarchy-based playing cards in an attempt to entice the intelligencia into accepting monarchy that is patriarchal, except with the "Ace" being the top of the deck, not the bottom.

Why?

Well, the lowest shall lead?

Obviously, this was a feigned monarchism in that the real control was the people, the lower classes. Hence, communism.

However, this communism, a part of the very game of bridge (or "britisch," an old Russian game -- coincidence? coincidence? Red commies?), is a unifying of the "monarchy" with the leadership of the "Ace," the supreme one. Elevation of the least.

What is, however, the "monarchy" in bridge?

Well, notice that the "suits" determine which monarch appears to rule (but really is subservient to the Ace -- the least). The "suits" is an obvious reference to corporates. And, one "suit" rules, is trump. (Donald, anyone? Please -- so obvious.) Monopoly, derived from bidding.

A corporate monarchy, decided by bidding between suits, with the least -- the Ace -- as the supposed head of everything.

And yet, notice that "no trump" actually is highest. Why is that? Well, the templars, like Sir Gitell-Mann, are "no man." Hidden. Not seen. The real powers, whom not even the suits control.

[jandrew]

I saw it.
I shalln't miss it.

jandrew

[spotlight7]

Hi:

OKB is owned by bbo? The other bridge sites are all under the control of bbo.

They got us, we have to play bridge under bbo control.

Regards,
Robert

[jjbrr]

Can you out the gimmick, Inquiry?

[pooltuna]

jdonn, on Feb 23 2010, 04:07 PM, said:

FYI you don't have a right to frea speach here. You do however have a right to prove you don't know what a monopoly is.

that's a game that has the same luck factor as bridge, right?

[pooltuna]

spotlight7, on Feb 23 2010, 05:31 PM, said:

Hi:

OKB is owned by bbo? The other bridge sites are all under the control of bbo.

They got us, we have to play bridge under bbo control.

Regards,
Robert

FRED RULES!!!!!!!!!!

[jjbrr]

kenrexford, on Feb 23 2010, 04:43 PM, said:

BBO is the Man?

Wow.

I mean, I have notice a one-world-government feel to BBO. All this smells like League of Nations or United Nations control of bridge playing, and stuff.

When I found out about the monopoly, I started looking into things. Strange, but the name "Gitelman" is extremely curious. Apparently, Sir Gitell-Mann was a Prussian knight of the Templar movement who originally introduced monarchy-based playing cards in an attempt to entice the intelligencia into accepting monarchy that is patriarchal, except with the "Ace" being the top of the deck, not the bottom.

Why?

Well, the lowest shall lead?

Obviously, this was a feigned monarchism in that the real control was the people, the lower classes. Hence, communism.

However, this communism, a part of the very game of bridge (or "britisch," an old Russian game -- coincidence? coincidence? Red commies?), is a unifying of the "monarchy" with the leadership of the "Ace," the supreme one. Elevation of the least.

What is, however, the "monarchy" in bridge?

Well, notice that the "suits" determine which monarch appears to rule (but really is subservient to the Ace -- the least). The "suits" is an obvious reference to corporates. And, one "suit" rules, is trump. (Donald, anyone? Please -- so obvious.) Monopoly, derived from bidding.

A corporate monarchy, decided by bidding between suits, with the least -- the Ace -- as the supposed head of everything.

And yet, notice that "no trump" actually is highest. Why is that? Well, the templars, like Sir Gitell-Mann, are "no man." Hidden. Not seen. The real powers, whom not even the suits control.

kenrexford for mod!

[bid_em_up]

Ken obviously has waaaayyyy too much free time on his hands.

[Fluffy]

jdonn, on Feb 23 2010, 09:37 PM, said:

Anyone who didn't log on the past few hours missed the whole saga, that seems unfair.

Damnit!!!!, no screenshot or something?

Ben, send it to my mail please

[PhantomSac]

I could share the PM meistere sent me, but its veryyyyy unsuitable lol

[Fluffy]

I could read some of it on general BBO dscussion, sounds like a smurf account of a young guy.

[jjbrr]

Is smurf the same as our use of gimmick?

[Fluffy]

I believe so yes. Not sure of wha tis the correct english word, but I am sure to have heard smurf before.

[jjbrr]

I believe we intend gimmick to mean fake, as if they don't want to reveal their identity but they want to be a nuisance or cause mischief. Though I suppose it could mean a lot of things.