BBO Discussion Forums: Your bid - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Your bid

Poll: after 1S p 1N (F1) (28 member(s) have cast votes)

after 1S p 1N (F1)

  1. 2C (4 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  2. 2N (4 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  3. 3C (9 votes [32.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.14%

  4. 3S (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  5. 3N (4 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  6. 4D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. 4S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  8. other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2010-February-19, 16:16

stjk, on Feb 19 2010, 09:38 AM, said:

Thanks to all the replies.

It seems so far 3C got the most vote (7 times) followed by 3S (6 times).

Pard's actual hand is:

Ax
Txxx
KTxx
Axx

So if you bid 3C or some GF bid then you may end up in slam, which will
make (S 2-3 split, both HQ and CQ onside).

If you bid NF 2C/2N/3S, you may endup in game.

Kind of a loaded way to analyze this.

If you do such-and-such, you might end up in slam, but then you might not.

If you do the other, you might end up missing slam, but then you might not.

Sounds like either route might end up in game or slam.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#22 User is offline   lmilne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 2009-October-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 2010-February-19, 20:53

kenrexford, on Feb 19 2010, 05:16 PM, said:

If you do such-and-such, you might end up in slam, but then you might not.

If you do the other, you might end up missing slam, but then you might not.

Sounds like either route might end up in game or slam.

And either game or slam might make 10, 11, or 12 tricks. Anything could happen!
0

#23 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-February-21, 02:36

Having opened 1♠, I now bid 3♣. Probably the first time in like I make such a jump bid on 3 cards lol.

(Would not open 1♠, though.)
0

#24 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-February-21, 11:46

whereagles, on Feb 21 2010, 01:36 AM, said:

Having opened 1♠, I now bid 3♣. Probably the first time in like I make such a jump bid on 3 cards lol.

(Would not open 1♠, though.)

HUH? Let's see, here. A hand with six spades, and on the razor's edge between game force and not game force if partner has a response, would open something other than 1S? Only if playing a forcing club system.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#25 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-February-21, 13:42

or a natural system that has a bid for that sort of hand? :)
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users